And, this still doesn't excuse Trump from not accepting Nadler's invitation to call his own witnesses. So what's your ultimate point here?
Voelker and Hale were on the Dem list as well, that’s the only reason anyone from GOP list was called.Relevant people like Voelker and Hale testified. Just not on the same panel Nunes wanted. Is that what the complaint is? Or that Mr. FusionGPS wasn't called as a witnesses to derail the process?
ll witnesses relied upon by the whistlebl
Chaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalluuuuuuuuuuuupaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa!!!!!!!
it’s hilarious to watch the house managers cry about not getting witnesses in the senate trial when they shut down every witness request from the GOP during house hearings.
I’m no different from the dems
Repugs asked for Hunter Biden, irrelevant
Repugs asked for assholes who push the debunked conspiracity that Ukraine hacked USA, irrelevant bull
Who else was denied?
Except the two you got shoved up your ass right now.
Pelosi rushed the articles through and overplayed her hand. She bungled the out of this. Should have just gone to court to force Bolton etc to testify. She played games with the house process thinking she had power and now gets to face the reality that turtle has and always had all the power.
You're trying top deflect.I’m no different from the dems
Sad.
Nothing would've changed.
Now the electorate gets a full ten months to take in what a sham this trial is and see what Bolton, et.al., have to say.
The timing is fine.
But thanks for admitting Bolton would've ed you.
Burisma is at the center of the entire impeachment...Hunter Biden irrelevant
No one claimed Ukraine hacked the election, irrelevant straw man.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...ackfire-233446
Alan Dershowitz disowns his pre-Trump views on impeachment:
‘I retract it’
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/alan-dershowitz-disowns-his-pre-trump-views-on-impeachment-i-retract-it/
Hunter himself is completely irrelevant aside from being the subject of the sham investigation announcement Dennison wanted.Burisma is at the center of the entire impeachment...Hunter Biden irrelevant
No one claimed Ukraine hacked the election, irrelevant straw man.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...ackfire-233446
"In 33 years in public service I have never seen a government lawyer lie the way Cipollone did" : Ex-CIA director
Cipollone told the chamber that Republicans were barred from attending depositions of witnesses in the House.
As transcripts show, there were Republicans asking questions of the witnesses.
Even the mention of the House depositions by the White House
was pointless because Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is trying to block the do ents, evidence, interviews, and depositions from being entered in as evidence in the Senate trial.
"Further evidence of the contagion of Mr. Trump’s dishonesty & corruption,” he tweeted.(Brennan)
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/in-33-years-in-public-service-i-have-never-seen-a-government-lawyer-lie-the-way-cipollone-did-ex-cia-director/
Well, it would've been great had Dennison not obstructed congress.
lied to Congress
spied on Congress
Except they didn't. See above re: Voelker and Hale.
You never answered my question. Why was FusionGPS guy a relevant witness? Or literally everyone the Whistleblower talked to?
There's gotta be legitimacy to the ask before we start crying foul about being precluded from having the witness testify.
Cipollone lies, but you have no
Trash obstructed, obstructs Mueller. Why?
Trash obstructed, obstructs impeachment. Why?
Dershowitz Argument that Trump Could Let Putin Take Alaska Shows Up in House Brief
At least one individual involved in President Donald Trump’s defense
thinks he can’t be impeached—even if he were to intentionally allow foreign armies to conquer and steal U.S. territory?
The shocking claim was made by Harvard Law Professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz in his recent book, The Case Against Impeaching Trump.
“Assume [Vladimir] Putin decides to ‘retake’ Alaska, the way he ‘retook’ Crimea,”
Dershowitz writes on pages 26 and 27 of his book.
“Assume further that a president allows him to do it,
because he believed that Russia has a legitimate claim to ‘its’ original territory.
That would be terrible,
but would it be impeachable?
Not under the text of the Cons ution.”
https://lawandcrime.com/impeachment/dershowitz-argument-that-trump-could-let-putin-take-alaska-shows-up-in-house-brief/
Repukes fall right in line and vote like the Cult Sheeple they are-
this is the GOP SENATE
does anyone still dispute that the entire right wing of Amerikkka is NOT a CULT?
just acquit him already
the zombies are 100% gone.
Volker and Hale were on the Dem witness list. Not a single witness republicans wanted to call that was not on the Dem list was allowed.
The link I provided from house permanent select committee already answered your question.
If I sue a Apple for breaching their contract to provide me with 1000 iPhones, do you think I get discovery on the new devices they're developing?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
