hater: schizophrenic, or bad with percentages?
That same strategy was obliterated in 2016
hater: schizophrenic, or bad with percentages?
Wtf are you on PCP?
How can you compare a national presidential election to an opinion poll???
holy
I'm comparing two posts by the same person, on the same day.
You: "Democrats are dumb to impeach because only 37% of Americans support impeachment."
Also you: "Democrats can run on socialism because 30% of Americans support socialism."
Today's neolib dims are to the right of Richard Nixon
Our Last Liberal President -- >
And an even harder truth must by now be evident to the most dreamy of Democratic liberals: The last liberal American president was not a Democrat. The last liberal American president turns out to have been Richard M. Nixon.
First, let us define liberalism as the belief that government can be the national instrument of democracy, capable of promoting economic and social justice.
Next, let us look at the words of the only American president ever to champion a federally guaranteed minimum income of $5,500 for every family with dependent children. That plan, which required job training for parents and child care for children, was objected to by some because it provided far less for the rich states than the poor states.
Nixon responded: "We reject that argument because we are one country. Consider the name of this nation: the United States of America. We establish minimum national standards because we are united. We encourage local supplements because we are a federation of states. And we care for the unfortunate because this is America."
One American president made his "No. 1 domestic priority" a national health plan that would have required employers to offer insurance with standard benefits to all their employees. Dental care, mental health care and a free choice of doctors and hospitals were included. And after three years, employers (in what is now globally condemned as "employer mandate") would be required to pay 75 percent of the insurance premiums.
Hater the dolt.
Most confused poster on this site.
He ain't mixed up, he's just bored.
Hes not bored with stupidity.
He eats if for breakfast.
Nixon started the EPA and passed several expansive amendments to the voting rights act in 1970 including lowering the voting age to 18 iirc. Also, Republicans were overwhelmingly pro-abortion back then (it was looked at a limited government thing) so if you have any understand of history saying someone is similar in the political spectrum policy wise to early 1970s republicans is not really some massive insult. Youre just projecting that you have no understanding of America history at all.
Nixon obv was a racist POS based on the tapes (he was for abortion in cases of rape and if a black married a white iirc lol) and paranoid but policy wise he was pretty great for a Republican
So Nixon was a racist POS like Ronald Reagan?
Do you think I'm pro-Reagan or something? Lol
I'm just saying...Reagan is like the Godfather of conservatism/Republicanism.
Not anymore, too pro-immigration.
Reagan would be a RINO today, tbh... he actually did amnesty illegals
None running can not just like clinton
He’d basically be Hillary tbh
Not Present.
Might want to check the numbers on that claim, hoss.
Both true and correct statements. I think you are just letting numbers confuse you. Democrats already won twice on socialism via Obama. Don't let the numbers confuse you just because they are both on 30s doesn't mean they correlate
Now that I think of it Nixon also signed OSHA into law too iirc
No you ing clown, I was talking about voters switching sides, not politicians.
he's referring to the square mileage tbh
Are you saying the majority of the country is urban?
I am actually referring to the number of individual townships and small rural areas that actually get out to vote. If you want to ignore those people, go ahead, make that mistake again.
States are full of small towns and villages that have stories like steel mills closing and such, and these don't seem to matter as much because those affected aren't part of a protected class, most of the time, and because the town itself is individually insignificant statistically. It doesn't sell copy to talk about Joe Bob's job going away. Not sensational enough. Big media likes to report on what sells copy, and people read what concerns them and their own areas.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)