Biden Keeps Proving He'd Be Trump's WEAKEST Opponent
What is the allegation?
Trash is gonna blame Ukraine on scapegoat Julie Annie, his idea, not mine, etc, etc
Trump’s DOJ Just Threw Rudy Giuliani Under The Bus
a statement on Sunday night that distanced the DOJ from Rudy Giuliani.
The New York Times reported:
The Justice Department distanced itself on Sunday from Rudolph W. Giuliani, President Trump’s personal lawyer,
declaring that department officials would not have met with Mr. Giuliani to discuss one of his clients had they known that federal prosecutors in New York were investigating two of his associates.
“When Mr. Benczkowski and fraud section lawyers met with Mr. Giuliani, they were not aware of any investigation of Mr. Giuliani’s associates in the Southern District of New York and would not have met with him had they known,” said Peter Carr, a department spokesman.
By declaring Giuliani too radioactive to touch, the DOJ has not only thrown Trump’s lawyer under the bus,
but they have made sure that a sizable chunk of Giuliani’s business just vanished.
Rudy Giuliani has been running around the world running a shadow foreign policy and also
selling himself as someone who can influence agencies and departments in the Trump administration.
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/10...iticus+USA+%29
What does it mean?
Bad <> Illegal
You have to charge a specific crime before you investigate for a crime. This is why warrants exist.
Giuliani's 'proof' that Biden was corrupt was paid for by an indicted oligarch who funded Manafort
On broad terms, that scandal is how easily Donald Trump is manipulated by anyone appealing to either his ego or his pocketbook.
In a more narrow sense, there’s only a single scandal because
the same people behind the Russia scandal are also the ones that set up the Ukraine scandal.
The whole Russian scandal happened because Donald Trump and his associates were ready suckers for the idea that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton.
With the Ukraine scandal, it seems that the very same people took the very same approach, and Trump was still ready to bite.
If Giuliani didn’t know Firtash, he certainly knew a lot of people who did know the Ukrainian oligarch in exile.
In fact, he knew a lot of people who were being paid by Firtash, and
those people seem to have worked long and hard to create the conspiracy theories that Giulani trotted out to the Times. That includes
providing Giuliani with his one “witness” … who has since, rather inconveniently, retracted his story.
Giuliani’s associations with Firtash go way past happenstance, and miles beyond coincidence.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/18/1893457/-Giuliani-s-proof-that-Biden-was-corrupt-was-paid-for-by-an-indicted-oligarch-who-funded-Manafort?detail=emaildkre
Already posted.
Or were you asking what "inference" means?
I keep seeing what bad optics doesn't mean. What does it mean?
You said what it doesn't mean.
Where did you say what it does mean?
DMC doesn't know what "bad optics" means.
What a ing idiot.
Bidens paid money for influence. This isn't a tough one, Chump.
Do you think the optics are good for Biden, neutered Chump?
What a ing idiot.
You said "Optics bad" then made the leap from "should we investigate" to "should we investigate a crime".
If you think the optics are bad, why are they bad? Why do you take issue with "so you agree it looks bad"?
If you agree it looks bad, what looks bad? Whatever it is, why wouldn't you want it investigated?
optics[ op-tiks ]SHOW IPA
EXAMPLES|WORD ORIGINSEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR optics ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
1. (used with a singular verb) the branch of physical science that deals with the properties and phenomena of both visible and invisible light and with vision.
2. (used with a plural verb) the way a situation, action, event, etc., is perceived by the public or by a particular group of people:
The optics on this issue are pretty good for the Democrats.
Administrators worry about the bad optics of hiring new staff during a budget crisis.
You said it. Now you want to shift the burden to someone to tell you why someone should be investigated. Maybe if you explain why the optics are bad you'll have your answer.
I showed the definition to avoid your word wrangling games.
What a ing idiot.
You still didn't say what you meant. Why are the optics bad?
Investigated by whom? Step up and say what YOU want to be investigated and by whom and why, tough guy.
You won't.
Because you're a little ankle biting .
lol
Neutered Chump lashing out because he can't come to terms with Biden's corruption.
You can easily explain why you think the optics are bad. Why haven't you?
Once we get that out of the way, we can discuss investigations.
Dennison's stupid G7 stunt with his failing Doral resort was the worst optics and a real likely violation of the Cons ution. That would've been completely worthy of an investigation by the appropriate authority.
Dennison's stupid quid pro quo demands from Ukraine were the worst optics and a real likely violation of campaign finance laws and the Cons ution. That is completely worthy of an investigation by the appropriate authority.
What are you saying Hunter Biden did?
pooplov
Why did you say "optics bad"?
Weren't you saying it looks bad? If so, why?
It looks like something bad could have happened.
What are you saying Hunter Biden did?
Step up, tough guy.
What are you saying Hunter Biden did?pooplov
Like what?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
