Reply With Quote
They don't need to vote to get the impeachment inquiry going, genius
Can't even bring themselves to vote
"whistle-blower"
Biggest democratic failure since Kavanaughty
Called it
They don't need to vote to get the impeachment inquiry going, genius
Then why did they scheduled it and then canceled it
Sign of weakness tbqh
More importantly tell me this. If they scheduled it why did they not go through with it???
yet another impeachment thread from a stupid look-at-me mofo
When was it scheduled to take place?Then why did they scheduled it and then canceled it
Sign of weakness tbqh
More importantly tell me this. If they scheduled it why did they not go through with it???
Link?
Sounds like your upset no one reads your masses of you pollute this board with, you sad, sad man, you.
I thought the impeachment inquiry was a big deal
Now we need to refrain from making threads about it?
And
When was the vote scheduled to take place?I thought the impeachment inquiry was a big deal
Now we need to refrain from making threads about it?
And
Link?
Schiff is now pivoting and saying the quid pro quo was about the White House meeting and is abandoning the claim that military aid was being withheld
Can't even bring themselves to vote
Biggest democratic failure since Kavanaughty
Called it
Chump, ask Nancy she's the one that canceled it
No, I'm asking you.Chump, ask Nancy she's the one that canceled it
You said it was scheduled.
When was the vote scheduled?
Link?
Because they can still interview people behind close doors, leak what they want and hide what they want and without it being a formal investigation Republicans can't subpoena and call witnesses of their own.Then why did they scheduled it and then canceled it
Sign of weakness tbqh
More importantly tell me this. If they scheduled it why did they not go through with it???
aka, Dems playing the same legal hardball that Repugs screwed the Dems with, to which you didn't object.
iow, Dems must play fair, but Repugs can screw the Dems
True. Elections have consequences.
I'll leave this here for people to run away from
is there any meaningful distinction re the rules for judicial impeachments and the one at issue?
Not that I've seen. The three impeachments referenced were all Article 3 judges, but the (non)requirement of authorization from the House flows from Art. I, Sec. 2 which gives the House "the impeachment power" regardless of who's being impeached (i.e., Article I vs. Article III).
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job
Good . It's the best thing do. The stupid impeachment inquiries have only skyrocketed the orange buffoon's approval ratings just like I predicted would happen.
“Pelosi seems to believe that she can hold a press conference and expect courts to accept that a formal impeachment process has begun,” George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley wrote in a Wednesday morning blog post. “Some judges are likely to be uncomfortable with such an immaculate impeachment.
Meanwhile, legal analysts say that should this clash end up before a judge, House Democrats could have a tricky time in court.
Last edited by ducks; 10-16-2019 at 12:23 PM.
Cherry picking his best poll and ignoring Rasmussen's bias is cute and all. The rub is Morning Consult has him at 35% approval and his aggregate of all the polls is 41.6%.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...ex_cid=rrpromo
Holy . Platform of bluster is back??
Link to what? My prediction or Trump's approval rating?
Miss me, Counselor Crayola?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
