if true, that sucks too.
Are.you pro-doxxing now?
if true, that sucks too.
Are.you pro-doxxing now?
lol playing coy on the one hand, pretending y'all don't know that doxxing and outing whistleblowers is dangerous to the targets, while stoking outrage about doxxing on the other.
Totally schizzed out, man.
It's not. He shouldn't be terrorized for doing his job, following the rules, and being a patriot on top of that.
Same people that now about this complained that Snowden was a traitor because he didn't follow the rules in outing the surveillance state. Can't have it both ways.
And don't give me logical reasons why he wouldn't be a target when you had some stupid fanatics showing up with a rifle on Comet Pizza or some other deranged Trump mailing explosives.
Did you like it when that happened, Qhris?
Yes or no.
So...Doxxing bad again, but whistle blowing good again?
Just want to see what issues have jumped sides and who thinks what was once bad is now good for them and their side...
I didn't say it didn't happen. I just asked for a link.
Derp be sure you thank Chris for that link
im not sure when doxxing was good, particularly in situations where someone could easily become a target of violence
whistleblowing is good, which is why there are laws protecting whisteblowers who use the proper channels
the gray area is snowdens who are are whisteblowers in spirit but not by law, because they went about it through a route not sanctioned by law
lol Darrin cares about this one hard; still hasn't read one actual story about the impeachment hearings.
yeah, charlie.
so he went through the proper channels right? lol! the dude went straight to schiff and worked together behind the scenes. that's def not protocol but whatever.
hearsay isn't whistleblowing!!!
btw, lmao at your quote but specifically the "patriot" part of it.
what are you basing this on? your own personal opinions on whistleblowing?
because he legally filled a whistleblower form which allowed him to report information he heard from others. your agreement with the policy isn't relevant. but there's no 2 ways around it. he's a whistleblower period
"A source told CNN that the official 'did not have direct knowledge of the communications' instead relying on 'learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work'.
It is those details that have reportedly played a role in a decision that the 'complaint did not fit the requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law', the official added."
hearsay! exactly what i've stated.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/19/polit...ils/index.html
"The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general"
the left always trying to rewrite history and change the meaning of words to fit their narrative. the left are nothing but crooks!
Yes, but he filed the appropriate paperwork.
And the right would never dare do anything like that!
which makes him a whistleblower.
whether his complaint is credible is a different level of analysis
just because you filled out paperwork doesn't mean you're a literal whistleblower. god you're an idiot. go post some more in my thread you're so obsessed over. better yet, tell me my post count in this thread. ing dip .
Yes, he's the idiot here
he most def is and you love blowing whistles you whistle blowing tranny.
“a literal whistleblower”
koriwhat thinks this dude is actually out here blowing a whistle like Joey Crawford
^^^ no one cares what you got trolls have to say... keep falling on deaf ears you dumb !
failed use of the word literal followed up by begging to bump his thread.
And he's a whistleblower because the appropriate IG (bad now) said he is.
Now kori's going to reply saying he's ignoring me.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)