Something like Derozan to Detroit, Drummond to Boston, and Hayward to San Antonio works. If y'all are still wanting to trade Derozan.
atl wants help but there’s no point. they should just tank.
Something like Derozan to Detroit, Drummond to Boston, and Hayward to San Antonio works. If y'all are still wanting to trade Derozan.
i'd take that. derozan's the better scorer, but hayward can succeed off the ball, is a better shooter and defender.
Hayward after that injury, pass. Atlanta's GM is a joke, we need to start making business with them somehow.
Why?
What they have right now isn’t working out too well for them. Hunter and reddish are not playing up to expectations and all they have is TY and Collins. They’d actually have great post play to add to TY and they’d have the #1 pick, #7 pick and #17 pick. TY , BG and Andre plus those 3 picks is a lot more promising then what they have now.
I would also like to improve the team via trade, but so far had seen very little sensible trade. Why would anyone trade assets for players that we deem to be bad? Who is willing to part asset for half a season for DDR? Not to mention salary match and roster space. Only feasible trade for DDR and LMA is teams wanting to get rid of bad long term contracts trading for DDR to get out of their mess and we wanna pick them up so that the forum and about what a terrible job the FO had done?
The best move now is to replace Forbes with Carroll in the SL and see how the team perform.
Last edited by XDT76; 01-03-2020 at 08:32 PM.
Hunter and Reddish are rookies. It would be incredibly dumb to trade rookie scale players with upside for albatross contracts tied to players who don't even move the needle.
Would rather have Drummond then Hayward. Drummond is younger and can help cover up a lot of this teams weaknesses on defense. Not a big LMA fan but I think he’d excel playing next to Drummond.
Steven Adams abused us last night. We need Drummond. Not just because there are many Adams in the league, but because hes a pretty damn good player too.
Spurs and trade deadline is like conflating Trump and rational decision, tbh. It's not going to happen. We have who we have until the offseason.
Pop running for president is more likely then the spurs doing an in-season trade unfortunately lol
“That's the good thing about being president, I can do whatever I want.”
President Obama Feb 11, 2014
I think it might be the Bucks vs the Rockets for the NBA le
are you re ed or something? shut the up
Hmmmmmm
"I can do this all day"
Captain America
The problem with Drummond is that he can't shoot for outside of about 5 feet. Like he's down in the <.350 range outside of 5 feet. I haven't checked lately, but maybe even <.300. That makes him a specialist, and the wrong kind of specialist for the "New NBA".
Add to that the fact that he's making north of $25M this season, and has 2 years left on his contract after this. Putting him on the roster would be a commitment to being a totally different kind of team. I'm not sure they have the personnel to be that kind of team. He would be nice to have in certain cir stances. But when you look at what the Spurs would have to give up to match salaries?
Poeltl with minutes could put up some really good numbers. Unfortunately with our lack of shooting, he can't play much with our current team. He sure is a starting centre though and could be sign for as little as 8mil/py.
Edit* Point is, no to Drummond. Besides, he is opting out.
What I looked at did not show 5 ft, but it did show that about 92% of Drummond's shooting is within 10' of the basket, with almost 60% of that within 3 ft. You are certainly correct that he has no shooting range to speak of.
I took a glance at the raw data, and found that Drummond has attempted 18 3pt shots this season so far, out of which he has made - wait for it - zero.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)