This sums it up pretty well...
what an idiot.![]()
This sums it up pretty well...
Exact same thing could be said of those pushing natural origin but you don’t say about that![]()
I thought you agreed the virus was of natural origin but was leaked
Who are those?
I said I thought the Chinese modified a virus and it somehow leaked from WIV.
Did you really waste one of your now rare posts for this weak ass failed attempt at a gotcha?
oh ok
Oh ok, you were serious? Lol. Why not just start with the person you quoted and bolded that sparked this conversation and posted the laughable new “study” pushing natural origin.
Of course I'm serious. You mean the person that said he didn't believe that report?
Posting news articles isn't an endorsement nor an attempt to connect da dots.
Plus, if it was indeed from 'natural origin', there would be nothing surprising about it. That would be where the vast majority of diseases that affect humans come from.
This is why conspiracies like the lab leaks, etc have a much higher bar to clear and bigger scrutiny...
a few pages back I said the jury is still out. I have an open mind, I can wait for the consensus but yours is already made up.
Modified a virus of natural origin.
The time to believe something is when you have evidence to do so.
I read his comment of not believing the report because the sources had slanted eyes as being sarcastic. When I asked him if he believed the report he didn't respond so he'll have to chime in.
There is quite a bit of evidence leading to lab leak, not so much for happening in nature.
A natural virus was engineered/modified and then lab released?
Very high standard conspiracy with no proof. Speculation sure, evidence, no.
Evidence it was not engineered from the article you posted claiming it was.
"The jumbling together of genetic material from the virus and the animal does not prove that a raccoon dog itself was infected. And even if a raccoon dog had been infected, it would not be clear that the animal had spread the virus to people. Another animal could have passed the virus to people, or someone infected with the virus could have spread the virus to a raccoon dog."
![]()
WTF????
Article notes that they found genetic data from a market linking the virus to raccoon dogs for sale there.
It mentions your conspiracy of lab leak but stresses that the virus could have spread from wild animals (possibly natural origin), hence my comment that pgard was correct.
The article did not show any evidence that the virus was engineered nor a lab leak, as you say it is.
Get your right, idiot.![]()
I was mocking you nut.
The article you linked does not show evidence of anything
You posted a study from the same authors who posted the exact same theory a year ago. You can just admit you posted a study you didn’t understand or continue flailing around being butthurt. Your call nut.
What difference does it make if it's engineered? Most everyone agrees the Chinese government is bad already so what does the info change? We not going to war with them obviously
people believe whatever they want. It's funny watching people be so dedicated to a ty stance that they will go down with the ship. I guess that's politics though.
You feeling ok Qtsa?
Critical thinking is beyond your understanding?
Studies with no evidence are bad now?
Your copy/paste walls show no evidence whatsoever that virus was engineered and leaked. Speculation yes, evidence, no.
The article reports that there was genetic data from a market linking the virus to raccoon dogs for sale. Argue with that, idiot.
There are currently 13 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 13 guests)