Same thing that 9-11 truthers do.Provide a link to any statement of mine that conclusively shows that I do not understand a lag in trends.
or
some more.
Declare victory at the drop of a hat without doing any work. smh.
Keep on
Lololololol trend lag.... bwahahahaha and you think daily cases and fatlities actually occur in 24 hrs....Same thing that 9-11 truthers do.
Declare victory at the drop of a hat without doing any work. smh.
Keep on
Classic
Now I know why you can't understand the data..... hahahahaahahahah
I never disputed this, nor ever asked or argued about daily tallies. We even commented that during weekends some cities didn't report, and tallied the totals on monday. Don't see how that changes anything at all though, sooner or later the data is tallied and comes in.
Anxiously awaiting your links to papers/stories backing up your claims of data manipulation.
yeah, facts based standard, imagine that!
Lancet editor Richard Horton told the Guardian: “Given the questions raised about the reliability of the data gathered by Surgisphere, we have today issued an Expression of Concern, pending further investigation.
“An independent data audit is currently underway and we trust that this review, which should be completed within the next week, will tell us more about the status of the findings reported in the paper by Mandeep Mehra and colleagues.”
imagine it was treated like religion. if it's wrong, you're just reading it wrong
Lol you understand that this prolongs the crisis, right?
That one really stuck to yah, huh?
WHO to resume hydroxychloroquine trial
The safety committee “recommended that there are no reasons to modify the trial protocol.”
The World Health Organization will restart its trial of hydroxychloroquine after getting the all-clear from a safety review, its chief announced today.
The U.N. health body paused enrolling patients in the part of its Solidarity trial studying hydroxychloroquine last week. Officials cited a large, observational study in the Lancet — echoing smaller studies — that suggested the malaria and lupus medication increased the risk of heart disease and death. The Lancet study has since come under fire, with the prestigious medical journal issuing an “expression of concern” about various problems with the data collection and methods.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...e-trial-298575
---
TSA DarrinS
Again, don't think there's been a retraction to the study and I don't think this is indicative of anything wrong with that particular study, but will update as we get more news.
What are you arguing now? I asked you to backup your claims of data manipulation, shouldn't be difficult since you said this isn't some conspiracy theory.
Never said that, already did. Gave you direct quotes of double counting positives and you're still to slow to understand lag. Enjoy.
Link to these direct quotes? I must've missed them since we started this conversation, or you posted them for somebody else?
There's no misunderstanding here, I asked you to back up your claim, and so far none of that happened.
Are there even any accounts from administration officials disputing the numbers and supporting your claim? I mean, if there's one party here interested in this crisis being over and having lower casualties, that's them.
Lol wut? So your idea is the cdc wants to come out and say they were wrong. They buried their most accurate fatality rate and never talked about it after releasing. You know the number that shows 2x the flu.....
Why would they be wrong? Numbers get revised all the time and you claimed this isn't a conspiracy theory and there's evidence of the data manipulation. Why can't they just present the same evidence you have presented here? (lmao)
Do let me know once you found all those reports and quotations backing up your contention of data manipulation so we can review them. I wouldn't want to think you're lying.
But useless, however some here used(d) it as a precursor to end times predictions.
This seems like a repe ive concept around here: Some goes down, certain people panic and call ELE right away. Others look at "models" and use that as evidence of the impending ELE. Some more level headed folks look at it and say "meh, based on history and how we react to things, nah". Then you get the "scientist" wannabes here ciphering.
Because historically we've done nothing during emergencies. Oh but it was in the past, so being wrong by a factor of 100 is just science. Obviously you had lots of disclaimers in your statements (I just didn't see them it seems).That one really stuck to yah, huh?
"I said before I knew " -boiled down
And no, it didn't stick with me. I just ran over it while I was looking at something someone else linked.
All you have to look at is dailycases and fatalities. They are not being used as such since not all of those cases or fatalities happened on that day.
Its not that difficult to understand basic math...
But you are obviously much smarter than me. Go here and look at the data yourself.
https://covidtracking.com
Start downloading and let me know what you find. I'm sure you can formulate your own idea, but if you need help let me know.
You're right. A scientific model should just assume we're gonna do some random, unarticulated , without any level of detail or precision, and rely on that assumption in spitting out figures that will be used to make social policy. You don't think through before you hit post, do you?
So they now rename themselves the Guess Who
Exactly no one called it an ELE.
Governments and WHO changed Covid-19 policy based on suspect data from tiny US company
Surgisphere, whose employees appear to include
a sci-fi writer
and
adult content model,
provided database behind Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine hydroxychloroquine studies
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...oxychloroquine
Oh so the experts aren't actually experts... but what will baseline bum and ChumpDumper do?Governments and WHO changed Covid-19 policy based on suspect data from tiny US company
Surgisphere, whose employees appear to include
a sci-fi writer
and
adult content model,
provided database behind Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine hydroxychloroquine studies
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...oxychloroquine
Blood group type may affect susceptibility to COVID-19 respiratory failure
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200603/Blood-group-type-may-affect-susceptibility-to-COVID-19-respiratory-failure.aspx
We're going in circles. I told you already that I simply won't take your word for it, back it up.
Like I said from the very begging, it's your conspiracy theory and you received every opportunity to back it up, but apparently cannot.
It's your claim, you're the one that has to support it. I supported mine.
I was thinking about the weirdness of the protests vs, the corona this morning as I was driving in to work. The City of San Antonio issues a permit for 1000+ protesters to walk arm in arm all over downtown, but won't let high school kids have a graduation? How asymmetrical is that?
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
