Coronavirus is one mutation away from infecting millions

[tholdren]

^ gossip

Lololol el nono can't read

[Blake]

I can't stop myself from gossiping

[Blake]

Fine.

I had a few 19 year old classmates in high school, you?

More adults in the classroom

[baseline bum]

This is completely false. The fact is ifr for 64 and under is less than flu

https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/06/23...age-race-14863
Stop the gossip

Did you just link something that said SARSCov-2 has 6x the ifr of the flu?

[tholdren]

Fine.

I had a few 19 year old classmates in high school, you?

19 year olds have more of a chance from death by flu almost 2x than covid.

[tholdren]

Did you just link something that said SARSCov-2 has 6x the ifr of the flu?

It doesnt with daily case counts.

[baseline bum]

It doesnt with daily case counts.

LOL this data is good but it's bad.

Make up your ing mind Dr Tholdren

[ChumpDumper]

Did you just link something that said SARSCov-2 has 6x the ifr of the flu?

thldren with the own goal.

[baseline bum]

thldren with the own goal.

Hi argument is funny. IFR is 0.64% in that link. But he says lower with the daily case counts, which have ramped up in a major way lately. But he also argues the deaths take a long time to report. So factoring in the time delay from positive test to death plus the long time delay from death to being reported it seems maybe it would be artificially low using Dr Tholdren math since the deaths haven't been counted but the infections, at by far the worst rate they have ever been in the US right now, are counted.

[tholdren]

LOL this data is good but it's bad.

Make up your ing mind Dr Tholdren

Lol data is only valid as its captured. Ifr is based on infection detected and undetected. With case counts continuing to trend up and deaths continuing to trend down especially at the current slopes ifr will continue to drop.

[Blake]

Dr tholderp, please show your math when breaking down this chart ok thx

[tholdren]

Hi argument is funny. IFR is 0.64% in that link. But he says lower with the daily case counts, which have ramped up in a major way lately. But he also argues the deaths take a long time to report. So factoring in the time delay from positive test to death plus the long time delay from death to being reported it seems maybe it would be artificially low using Dr Tholdren math since the deaths haven't been counted but the infections, at by far the worst rate they have ever been in the US right now, are counted.

Thats not correct. You have no concept of graphing data

[baseline bum]

Lol data is only valid as its captured. Ifr is based on infection detected and undetected. With case counts continuing to trend up and deaths continuing to trend down especially at the current slopes ifr will continue to drop.

You say there is a huge time delay between death to report, so sounds like you're just not counting the deaths from this current bounce but are counting the infections. LOL you linking an IFR of 0.64%.

[Winehole23]

It could be ing zero, we could go through, a scenario where no students die, and a load of teachers will still get the rona.

Absolutely.

Some people around here don't get the prevalence and danger of asymptomatic spreaders, which children over the age of ten are likelier to be than sick from COVID-19.

[ChumpDumper]

Ifr

Show your math.

[baseline bum]

Thats not correct. You have no concept of graphing data

If only Dr Tholdren published

[tholdren]

Dr tholderp, please show your math when breaking down this chart ok thx

This is false.

Literally the same flu data was given in march.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bus...s-2020-3%3famp

Same chart on left

What you have just explained is there has been no flu death at all since March 18 and 100 pct covid death.

Great work.

[tholdren]

If only Dr Tholdren published

I already have. You do not understand even the most basic principles of data collection to calculate very simple statistical outputs.

[ChumpDumper]

I already have.

Show your math.

[baseline bum]

I already have. You do not understand even the most basic principles of data collection to calculate very simple statistical outputs.

No you haven't, Chump keeps asking you to publish and you never do.

[tholdren]

This is false.

Literally the same flu data was given in march.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bus...s-2020-3%3famp

Same chart on left

What you have just explained is there has been no flu death at all since March 18 and 100 pct covid death.

Great work.

But I would not be shocked to hear you say you believe that there has been no flu death since march 18th.

Blake, you're 0 for 2 today when name calling after posting something you think you understand but do not.

[tholdren]

This is false.

Literally the same flu data was given in march.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bus...s-2020-3%3famp

Same chart on left

What you have just explained is there has been no flu death at all since March 18 and 100 pct covid death.

Great work.

But I would not be shocked to hear you say you believe that there has been no flu death since march 18th.

Blake, you're 0 for 2 today when name calling after posting something you think you understand but do not.

[baseline bum]

But I would not be shocked to hear you say you believe that there has been no flu death since march 18th.

Blake, you're 0 for 2 today when name calling after posting something you think you understand but do not.

Why don't you publish your math for ChumpDumper? If you already published it you could just link it for him.

[tholdren]

No you haven't, Chump keeps asking you to publish and you never do.

I've literally already shown you the houstin data, but you dont undetstand that concept, so me showing you anything else would be as redundant as showing you the houston data, or even the ifr chart you dont understand. Do you think that number is stagnant?

[ElNono]

It doesnt with daily case counts.

more gossip