they're CHARGING for it?
He did. SPUTNIK is being produced in India as we chat
And Sputnik is $10 a pop one of the cheapest vaccines out there.
Sorry chump
they're CHARGING for it?
So production hasn't started and Putin didn't give it away.
lol hater
Thats if u wanna buy dumbo
Thats the going price.
Im sure pharma companies also have to pay some $ to have rights to produce. But thats with any vaccine from any country.
Chump. What a rookie
lol hater believes everything Russians say
Thats literally from an India TV news channel
chump
Who was speaking, hater?
Let me know how much vaccine has been produced since they started.
Weird that they would have to just start importing Sputnik May 1 when they're churning out so much vaccine according to you.
Bonus points for your continued rando unverified Twitter account worship.
Its an Indian broadcaster for christsakes
these pesky Russians are duping the Indian media as well as Indian government.
Another important chapter in the BlueAnon book of Theories
#blueanon
"...says RDIF CEO Kirill Dmitriev"
Are you saying RDIF CEO Kirill Dmitriev is an Indian broadcaster, hater?
Yes or no.
At udes Toward Vaccination More Favorable After J&J Vaccine Pause
https://scienceblog.com/522634/at ...-vaccine-pause
In a live interview in India TV
These pesky Russians are now live in air on foreign news broadcasters lying to us and spreading disinformation
#blueanon
Can't say Chinese virus but we can vilify Russians trying to help India.
Let's unpack this.
You think people are unable to lie or misrepresent anything because it's a live TV interview?
Or is it something special about Indian TV?
Or Russians?
What makes it impossible for him to tell anything but the absolute truth, hater?
Please explain your theory.
who is preventing you from speaking as you please?
Here we go with the impossibilities
"Its not impossible that Russian pros utes urinated on Trump" so it must have happened
"Its not impossible Russian CEOs to lie on TV" so it must be happening
"Theres no reason not to investigate"
198Chump
How about Pfize4 or Modern CEOs
What makes it impossible for them to tell anything but the absolute truth?
https://www.dw.com/en/is-sputnik-v-v...afe/a-57219314However, it's hard to precisely determine the efficacy of Sputnik V. It was approved for use in Russia last August before the state safety review had been completed. Eight months after the government's fast-track approval, there is still no reliable data on the vaccine. Russia has not yet made crucial primary data available to an independent drug testing authority.
In September, British medical journal The Lancet published partial results from Sputnik V's phase 1 and 2 trials. However, the two studies on safety, tolerability and immunogenicity only included 38 participants each. The findings stated a strong immune response, and said no serious adverse side effects had been detected.
International experts had strong reservations about the results — and not only because of the size of the trial groups. Several researchers pointed out a number of oddities: For example, even though the participants had been given very different forms of the vaccine, the study found that they all had the exact same level of antibodies in their blood on different days. They said that it could not be a coincidence that the participants all had identical levels of T-cells, which fight the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Some 40 scientists from Europe, the United States, Canada and even Russia signed an open letter raising concerns that data might have been manipulated.
On February 2, Russian scientists published interim results from phase 3 trials in The Lancet. They said that over 18,000 participants had received two doses of the vaccine at an interval of three weeks and claimed that efficacy was at 91.6% with no serious side effects. Once again, their international colleagues responded with skepticism, pointing out that there could not be an independent evaluation if the primary data had not been published.
I think if the Russians really put this out there and made money off of it, someone will suss out how effective it is in reality.
Hate to see people be guinea pigs tho.
Odd that Russia doesn't was to release the primary data.
Dunno, I trust the corrupt kleptocracy there as far as I can throw it. Given how obviously Putin hates democracy and human rights, even less so.
A good example of why being skeptical of the Russian government is warranted:
Not releasing the primary research data to peer review for example.
They might be telling the truth, but the point of science is independent verification.
That's just it -- there is nothing stopping them from lying or misrepresenting anything.
But, being American, they can be subject to much more scrutiny for their statements.
Somehow, you believe Russian government types are completely incapable of lying or misrepresenting anything.
You take them at their word every single time.
Why?
yeah American CEOs never lie
Who said that, hater?
Show a quote.
U.S. will back proposal to waive patent rights and boost Covid-19 vaccine production
https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2...-patent-rights
Well, he didn't say he didn't care, he said he's not for or against (agnostic).
His main concern at this moment is that such deals don't delay vaccination right now, which sounds like a sensible argument
There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 12 guests)