Reply With Quote
I can still find some in stock online. I'm not talking the N95 kind, obviously, but whats recommended to lower serfs.
I can still find some in stock online. I'm not talking the N95 kind, obviously, but whats recommended to lower serfs.
ing savages
Why is voting by mail good enough for Trump but not anyone else?
You repeated the assertion without addressing just how it's possible for someone without a prescription to even obtain the drug, much less hoard it. If anything, the drug is being hoarded by manufacturers and authorities. If physicians are prescribing it as a off-label script, that's on them. That's not on the panic stricken public who has no access to it.
I get all that, please address the point I made.And I don't even think he did that with the notion or understanding that he would cause such a problem, but that's the difference of being a crisis communicator vs an entertainer.
I do take more issue to the fact he continued to double down on it afterwards, even after his own medical experts directly contradicted him, and the shortages were known. That's flat out stupid and enters the dangerous territory, for what? his ego and pettiness?
The right to vote isn't anywhere in the cons ution, not for the general public anyhow.
We eat rabbits, deer, cows and chickens. They are all animals.
The initial reports were that doctors indeed were hoarding them, to the point where some places simply had to tell pharmacists to stop filling off label prescriptions.
https://www.propublica.org/article/d...their-families
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/24/b...rus-drugs.html
https://www.wsj.com/articles/states-...it-11586095200
"That's on them" doesn't really invalidate the fact that you can point directly at the POTUS for sparking the hoarding, and then doubling down on it. Fortunately, there was actual State leadership here taking place so patients that actually needed the drug could get it.
Semantic dispute over what counts as a "mass grave" to follow
I don't know why they're talking about burying people in city parks. Plenty of room out there for temporary internment.
Literally dumped in a ditch
The only people having more sex are people who cohabitate and don't have kids. Single people and parents definitely aren't having more sex.
The real pregnancy boom is going to happen when this is all over.
The best ditch ever. A beautiful ditch. A ditch like it's never been seen before.
Not true at my house.
It's an orderly process, I'm sure. I've seen no stories about people's remains being disrespected.
I mean obviously everyone on Spurstalk is having tons of sex, I'm just talking about the general public.
Make sure you're posting real . Hater posted some supposed video from Equador, showing people burning bodies in the street. Fake news.
Isn't "Now This News" a source of choice for TheGreatTurd?
Hart Island is really a real thing. No telling if those are Covid-19 victims or just a routine burial. As the caption says, they've been burying the indigent and unknown out there for decades.
Not a loon site.
I have no idea. I see no major media mentioning it tho.
It's not news after 100 years; just recently more visible thanks to drones. The news is apparently burying COVID victims in city parks, which doesn't make much sense with Hart Island right there.
So, no evidence they're burying covid victims there.
See edit. It would be the best place to temporarily intern COVID victims IMO. I don't see what there is to debunk; there's a ton of bodies in the area.
blue state
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Posting Permissions