They’re reporting that Pete Buttigieg hired Shadow inc. to rig the Iowa caucus in his favor. After he “won”, he looks really awkward refusing to talk to reporters about his thoughts on the victory.
Thats what that means.
has reck said a single thing about yang in this back and forth?
at least will laid out his reasons
They’re reporting that Pete Buttigieg hired Shadow inc. to rig the Iowa caucus in his favor. After he “won”, he looks really awkward refusing to talk to reporters about his thoughts on the victory.
Thats what that means.
^moar fake news copium from the resident re
Sure, but how do you say it was rigged?
Why would I when Winehole is not looking for a serious discussion. I detected dishonesty from his first post addressing the tweet he posted.
He just proved it with Will.
That said, Will Hunting knows more about what Yang is about than me, no contest.
My main point is that Yang would be an upgrade over De Blasio or any run-of-the-mill New York politician. I never claimed I knew Yang's policies in granular detail. You're welcome.
Why did the DNC hire shadow ink in the first place? Why did they even need that company to tally the votes?
i'll talk to other posters if i like, thanks. I agree that Yang putting UBI on the agenda was momentous, but I doubt yoking it to a tax of any kind is good idea.
Do you have any take on Yang or are you just here to gnaw on ankles?
You don't know enough about Yang to offer an own take, but just enough to dismiss mine without further ado.
Love the honest back and forth!
You didn't answer my question.
Sure, but how do you say it was rigged? How did Shadow do it?
(I think Reck's real gripe is less than complimentary posts about the incoming Biden Administration. Seems to really bother him.)
You admitted to not knowing about him and yet you're here trashing him. Even when given a detailed post about what he's for.
I'd probably hold off if I were you on telling anyone here they dont know enough about someone to offer a take. 2 Pages and a day later you're still sore about it. Find a hobby.
Prejudging people seems to be your thing. I guess do your thing.
The conversation is *still* happening. It is no longer where it started.
Feel free to join in or let it go, up to you!
Pretending you don't judge people is conceited too.
Pete Buttigieg won the Iowa caucus by 1/10 of a percentage point. The DNC vehemently denied having anything to do with the shadow Inc. app company. We now know that’s not true, and they lied about that.
The DNC now refuses to talk to any investigators about the Iowa caucus or it’s involvement with shadow inc.
I think that’s su ious. You don’t.
^Another Derp alt to add to the ignore list
So I got:
- Ball Buster
- Bleke
- Chumpette
- General Virtue
- LaSíSí
- MASSA
- Nother Level
- President Trump
- Psychopav Chump
- Red Pill Regimen
- Soldier Lives Matter
- We Are All Witnesses
Any others I'm missing? Trying to get them all on ignore.
I think not. Different diction.
You still didn't answer my question.
How do you say Shadow rigged the caucus?
Maybe he's actually trying to put effort into this one.
Judging from the intercept report by Jordan Chariton, the DNC were the primary drivers for the shadow app being used in the Iowa caucus to count the votes.
Seeing how the DNC lied about it affiliation with the shadow app, and Mayor Pete’s awkward refusal to answer questions about his victory the next day, in my opinion, there was voter fraud in the Iowa caucus, arranged by the DNC through use of its app.
I answered your question. You won’t answer mine.
No, you didn't answer my question at all.
Try again.
How do you say Shadow rigged the caucus?
Now you’re just being purposely obtuse. You ing McCarthy smearer.
No. You said an app rigged the caucus.
How do you say the app did that?
The Pete Buttigieg campaign donated over $42,000 to the makers of the app.
Do you think there’s maybe, a conflict of interest there?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)