Not sure what "history" voters refer to... and Bloomberg would be the only billionaire running, AFAIK... he's just as establishment as Shillary, that's why I see an overlap there...
Again, not quite sure what's being 'ignored' here...
I saw other posters lashing out. Apparently you can't point to something he said that you don't like.
Not sure what "history" voters refer to... and Bloomberg would be the only billionaire running, AFAIK... he's just as establishment as Shillary, that's why I see an overlap there...
Again, not quite sure what's being 'ignored' here...
No offense, but you can't post all this and then point fingers at somebody else saying "Desperate narrative", tbh...
This whole thing is a narrative.
Pretty much, except for certain amount of conservatives, for some reason...
You have no business posting in a political forum, then.
I wouldn't take offense at your desperation. I was asked my take on Hillary's designs, and I gave them. I'm not wrong. You are bitter however.
Is that left, right? I don't keep track of non-serious sources... anyways, somebody added:
You also said I was rolling with a 'desperate narrative', yet, the narrative here is all yours... I'm just sticking to facts.
headline is wrong tbh. he wasn't offered money for an endorsement, he was offered a job on the campaign staff
One story out there right now is that Bloomberg is paying so much for ground level state operatives that other campaigns are having teouble filling positions.
Interesting, if true.
"Trump retweets doctored video from alt-right troll account"
Remember when he tweeted a video making fun of him thinking it about some "tough guys?"
Good times.
Sure, the narrative that this is just about conservative paranoia is desperate, frankly.
I didn't say it's conservative paranoia, I said that the rumor of a Shillary run almost always come from conservative outlets... Do tell how that's 'desperate' and/or not true...
Yea, that's not even really splitting hairs, tbh. You wanted to blame conservatives because you don't want to talk about Hillary's continued pursuit of the presidency. And nobody's forcing you; but you need to lash out.
I don't remember. If true, I imagine it making a year for a snowflake like you though.
Except that this so-called 'continued pursuit' is all in your head... do back it up... wait, you won't.
There should be more decorum in politics. I ain't supporting some dumb ass kid's antics. But this is all on the Dems' side of the coin either way.
Let me guess, it's another one of your 'gut feelings', and you need to be 'next-level' to get it, rofl
Oh, cos Hillary's very content to not pursue her options in obtaining the presidency
Just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.
lmao, so you can't back it up... didn't think so.
Cosmore doesn't get a pass, you won't either.
What exactly do you want me to back up?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)