Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 120
  1. #26
    NostraSpurMus phxspurfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    14,364
    Fair. But what about the healthy 20 or 30 something who doesn't pay that much in healthcare costs and has to pony up thousands more under Bernie's plan. What's the appeal to them?
    Whats in it for them


    same thing everyone says when they have to pay taxes for schools and roads. We live in a society of nice things that cost money to construct and maintain. Nothing is free. Not having to watch people starve on street corners while you complain about the homeless problem/watch your parents die from neglectful doctors and not afford their medications is something everyone should address, as everyone will benefit at some time or another. But no, yolo it up.

  2. #27
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,518
    Fair. But what about the healthy 20 or 30 something who doesn't pay that much in healthcare costs and has to pony up thousands more under Bernie's plan. What's the appeal to them?
    what about the drivers who are MANDATED by law to have insurance, but never have an accident?

    And what about the increasing number of 30 and younger people with diabetes, CVD, NAFLD, and "old people" diseases?

    are you trolling or ING stupid?

  3. #28
    NostraSpurMus phxspurfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    14,364
    The real truth though is that someone like you, a healthy guy in his 30s who makes good money, is always going to be subsidizing other people one way or the other.
    This. I am this guy, and am happy to subsidize society, and give on top of that. I'm in my prime, others aren't. If you want to address this Texas style:

    2 Corinthians 9:6-8
    Remember this: Whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows generously will also reap generously.

  4. #29
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    18,121
    That is the part that most conservative hand-wavers tend to gloss over.
    The part you Bernie bros are glossing over is that none of the successful universal healthcare models are remotely similar to Bernie's plan. He is proposing we copy a failed approach that to my knowledge is only still being used in Cuba.

  5. #30
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,275
    The part you Bernie bros are glossing over is that none of the successful universal healthcare models are remotely similar to Bernie's plan. He is proposing we copy a failed approach that to my knowledge is only still being used in Cuba.
    i think there are a lot of factors to the failed state of cuba besides their healthcare plan.

  6. #31
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,275
    if you are getting healthcare through an employer-sponsored program, your pay stub will already have lines addressing your tax withholdings, and a separate line for your health plan deduction.

    saying "but bernie's plan is going to increase the tax number" without considering that you are going to eliminate the health insurance deduction is incredibly misleading

  7. #32
    4-25-20 Will Hunting's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    22,310
    The part you Bernie bros are glossing over is that none of the successful universal healthcare models are remotely similar to Bernie's plan. He is proposing we copy a failed approach that to my knowledge is only still being used in Cuba.
    It’s the part I gloss over because it’s the part that’s never going to get done. There’s never going to be a ban on private insurance in this country.

  8. #33
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    18,121
    i think there are a lot of factors to the failed state of cuba besides their healthcare plan.
    Glossing over

    Honestly don't know how you go from wanting a universal healthcare system to wanting only what the govt says you can have.

  9. #34
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    50,681
    The part you Bernie bros are glossing over is that none of the successful universal healthcare models are remotely similar to Bernie's plan. He is proposing we copy a failed approach that to my knowledge is only still being used in Cuba.
    Not a Bernie bro, and not glossing over anything.

    Honestly, anything the Democrats are proposing are worlds better than the non-existent ideas that Trump is putting out there, and worlds better than the broken, hideously inefficient system we have now.

    Any Democratic proposal that vastly expands government coverage will cut wait times, reduce overall costs, make people healthier than they are now, and reduce bankruptcies.

    What you won't admit is our current system is ing broken, and the free market fairy ain't gonna magically fix it, because the "free market" broke it in the first place.

  10. #35
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,275
    going by the "average healthcare cost" feature, and assuming married filing jointly, the rough break-even point here is an income of $150k. a household income of that amount would place you roughly in the 85th percentile in the US

  11. #36
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    18,121
    It’s the part I gloss over because it’s the part that’s never going to get done. There’s never going to be a ban on private insurance in this country.
    So what is the hope if he's POTUS? That you get a public option maybe?

  12. #37
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    50,681
    Glossing over

    Honestly don't know how you go from wanting a universal healthcare system to wanting only what the govt says you can have.
    Ask an insurer for some procedure without pre-authorization, and tell me how theirbureaucrats' refusal to pay is any different in effect.

  13. #38
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,004
    And its the same as before, because health insurance. Plus, none of this is taking into account that SALT deduction limit is killing the middle class anyway. That would likely be reversed if any dem was president, because it was just a tax that targeted blue states. Removing that alone makes this easily at least a wash for me, personally.
    Solid point. Would make Uncle Free seem way more palatable if this were included, but I haven't heard any such discussion.

  14. #39
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,004
    The real truth though is that someone like you, a healthy guy in his 30s who makes good money, is always going to be subsidizing other people one way or the other. Right now your tax dollars are subsidizing the defense industry with spending we don’t need.
    Sad truth. But with an R, I'm at least getting promised tax cuts. Granted, I ended up paying more in taxes under Dear Leader. However, I will pay approximately 4x more if Uncle Free is elected.

    I just find it funny that everyone is quick to point at my demographic and say "fair share" or dumb like whatever the Boots said. I don't complain about it too much because I don't have a choice. My point is just that my demographic gets ed when it comes to tax reform and no one bats an eye. Which is not right.

  15. #40
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,275
    Glossing over

    Honestly don't know how you go from wanting a universal healthcare system to wanting only what the govt says you can have.
    sweden has all but eliminated private care. it covers about 2% of their people, is heavily regulated locally, and typically only offers supplemental coverage

  16. #41
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    18,121
    What you won't admit is our current system is ing broken, and the free market fairy ain't gonna magically fix it, because the "free market" broke it in the first place.
    I've said for over a decade on here that I'm not opposed to universal coverage. Just need to see a realistic plan for this country. No democrat has yet to offer one. Well I guess Obama offered a first step in the public option but got shot down immediately by his own party.

    I've never said the GOP has the answers. Outside of Lindsey Graham they have no idea's at all.

  17. #42
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,275
    Solid point. Would make Uncle Free seem way more palatable if this were included, but I haven't heard any such discussion.
    arent salt deductions basically the states getting subsidized by uncle sam?

  18. #43
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,004
    arent salt deductions basically the states getting subsidized by uncle sam?
    Sure, but so what?

  19. #44
    NostraSpurMus phxspurfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    14,364
    Solid point. Would make Uncle Free seem way more palatable if this were included, but I haven't heard any such discussion.
    Thats because they love them some taxes :shrug: even if they are ill-gotten, they will find a way to spend the revenue.

  20. #45
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    50,681
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Z2XRg3dy9k&t=891s

    Pros/cons as weighed by Jon Oliver

  21. #46
    NostraSpurMus phxspurfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    14,364
    Solid point. Would make Uncle Free seem way more palatable if this were included, but I haven't heard any such discussion.
    Not saying Uncle Free is great by any means, would rather be in better times where we didn't need such drastic measures. But anything is better than Kids in Cages. The current dude is literally a mix of Hitler and John Gotti. It doesn't end well for the country when a president can cir vent the checks and balances. Then we just turn into another hole Country.

  22. #47
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    Not saying Uncle Free is great by any means, would rather be in better times where we didn't need such drastic measures. But anything is better than Kids in Cages. The current dude is literally a mix of Hitler and John Gotti. It doesn't end well for the country when a president can cir vent the checks and balances. Then we just turn into another hole Country.
    ^posted from Auschwitz

  23. #48
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,541
    ^posted by Professor Pangloss, from the best of all possible worlds

  24. #49
    4-25-20 Will Hunting's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    22,310
    So what is the hope if he's POTUS? That you get a public option maybe?
    Yep a public option and price controls that make the public option attractive. I think someone like Buttplug might get a public option but it’d suck and would basically just be Medicaid level healthcare that doesn’t require an income test.

    Warren would be my choice but I think the damage is done with her and her campaign is over.

  25. #50
    4-25-20 Will Hunting's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    22,310
    Sad truth. But with an R, I'm at least getting promised tax cuts. Granted, I ended up paying more in taxes under Dear Leader. However, I will pay approximately 4x more if Uncle Free is elected.

    I just find it funny that everyone is quick to point at my demographic and say "fair share" or dumb like whatever the Boots said. I don't complain about it too much because I don't have a choice. My point is just that my demographic gets ed when it comes to tax reform and no one bats an eye. Which is not right.
    I have a hard time believing your tax liability goes up by literally 4x under Bernie. If that were true we’d be hearing other candidates talking about it (not you specifically but your (and my) demographic).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •