Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    127,873
    Federal court tosses conservatives' First Amendment suit against YouTube
    YouTube is not a "state actor" bound by the First Amendment, the court ruled.

    A federal court today rejected a conservative nonprofit's First Amendment suit against YouTube, ruling that the Google-owned company's "braggadocio" about free speech doesn't create a legal requirement to host others' content without restrictions.

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling against Prager University is a blow to some conservatives' arguments that platforms like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter are legally liable for decisions that, as they see it, silence right-of-center voices.

    YouTube is not a "state actor" bound by the First Amendment, the court ruled, rejecting Prager's argument that the company "performs a public function." It cited a Supreme Court precedent on that principle just last year.

    "Despite YouTube’s ubiquity and its role as a public-facing platform, it remains a private forum," the appellate court ruled.

    Prager University, co-founded by conservative talk-show host Dennis Prager, publishes videos with les like "Black Fathers Matter" and "So, You Think You're Tolerant?" It had argued that by restricting access to its videos through age limits and other means, YouTube was in legal violation of its stated commitment to act as a public forum for free expression.

    A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit upheld a lower court's ruling dismissing that claim, as well as one arguing YouTube had violated federal laws on deceptive advertising. "YouTube’s braggadocio about its commitment to free speech cons utes opinions," the court ruled today.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...endment-117769

  2. #2
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    72,138
    principled conservatives begging for nanny state when money is on the line

  3. #3
    Atheist Ninja RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    39,559
    In before Nathan89 cries about it.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    80,194
    Now if only Youtube, FB, twitter, etc werr reclassified as media like newspaper they could be sued for libel, etc.

    btw, Trash is suing NYT about Trash-Russian quid-pro-quo

  5. #5
    sick demented ring****** ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    105,679
    There's no way anyone involved could have thought this lawsuit would work. Prager's just going to beg for money now.

  6. #6
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    61,092
    Lol prager

  7. #7
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    32,649
    Someone put Nathan on suicide watch.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •