22 year old soccer player in Iran got killed by this.
Is there anyone other than Trump who thinks this is contained?
22 year old soccer player in Iran got killed by this.
The same people that are freaking out about this are the same people that think every single NBA injury is a season ender... only later to find out its just a contusion 90% of the time!
Not to sure about that one. 30 teams X 17 players (max) = 510. Assume 80% get it (way high) = 408. They are in the young age brackets 20's and 30's. Expected lethality at that age is .1% for the general population. For a sub population that is a) extremely fit b) lacking in co-mobidities (no much smoking, obesity, heart defects, etc) c) can afford the very best available health care... how low will the fatality rate go? I suspect that the players will pretty much be fine. Coaches, GM' s and so forth are an entirely different kettle of fish...
You're probably right there. I retract that expectation.
I was stating the current testing capacity in the US right now
I've seen nothing approaching that number.
I never said it was contained. I just think it’s already peaked or at the very least it’s been here for a month or two prior vs. just beginning. No matter what it’s going to look like a e once real testing begins. It’s rampant already.
No one is 100% out of the woods. If you look at the mortality demographics, there are at least SOME in every age bracket over 20. I consider the likelihood of any NBA players dying as extremely low, since it's a very small group, 450 at most, but it's not impossible.
What makes you think it has peaked?
Google is your friend
Why don't you just tell me where you found it?
I posted my link.
Literally no epidemiologist I've seen has said that we'ere anywhere near a peak. It has been here for months though. The WA outbreak has been traced back to mid Jan so yeah.
Ohio health official estimates 100,000 people in state have coronavirus
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...ve-coronavirus
FYI, if 400 NBA players get it, assuming a .1% fatality rate, you have almost a 1/3 chance an NBA player dies.
Geez
they’ve actually updated it to 20,695 per day. Doesn’t matter. Still a really low number compared to the population.
https://mobile.twitter.com/COVID2019...0%2Fframe.html
Thanks, finally.
So no numbers on actual tests performed.
OK.
The likelihood that it’s been here for months and that you’re typically contagious for roughly 2 weeks. Again, it’s just my thoughts.
I look at it as two peaks. The real peak, which no will ever truly know because there still isn’t any real significant amount of testing taking place and the perceived peak as testing becomes mainstream which everyone will point to. It’s really the only data that they’ll be able to rely on.
Again, my thoughts are that this was well into the US by early January. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of those flu cases through December were Conrona. Which likely puts a peak in a time where there was literally no testing at all.
Last edited by BacktoBasics; 03-12-2020 at 05:29 PM.
Through yesterday, there had been about 14,000 tests done nationwide in total. Not sure what the number is after today, but over half of those were done yesterday (8k). I'd imagine they've done something more than that today, so it might have doubled again today but we're obviously way behind.
I like your optimism. I hope you are correct
THere have 100% been flu situations that have actually been COVID19. We'll know what the peak is though, because that will be when the hospital system reaches the largest load. There hasn't been any peak. The number of cases has been able to fly under the radar and has been assumed to be flu, but its just growing. Now that we're finally starting to take this seriously the growth will slow, but it will still grow so any peak is still in the future.
Yeah, super late at this point but at least we can do ent this to avoid a similar cluster in the future.
Fair point but I still think that’s skewed. They typically aren’t quick to admit you for seasonal flu even if it’s bad. They’re going to be real quick to admit you now.
Yeah, but its a simple math problem because we're dealing with exponential growth. I read a great example of a pond being covered by Lily Pads. Assume you have a pond with one lily pad and it doubles every day, and you fully cover the pond on the 30th day. Well, the riddle is to ask when the pond is half way covered, which of course is on day 29. But whats interesting, is that you don't get to 1% coverage until day 24! So even though its been here for awhile, the fact that its growing exponentially means that it grows fairly slowly until it explodes.
So its really unlikely that we had a peak then it fell off on its own. Its likely just been growing the entire time until it is so prevalent that it can't stay under the radar. But you're right that now that we're hyper vigilant to it we're going to find cases everywhere now. Well assuming we can test for it.
Which cancer DeRozan or Forbes. I'd say Forbes is the more malignant piece as his streaky shooting masks his outright ineffectiveness to be on a roster, much less be your starting guard
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)