What explanation? Again you keep placing words in my mouth. And ascribing motives? What do you know about what I felt or didn’t feel when I responded to his post? Everything you are saying relies on pure conjecture.
What Democratic Party leader has endorsed post-birth abortions? Be specific. You’re just regurgitating your pastor crams down your throat.
What explanation? Again you keep placing words in my mouth. And ascribing motives? What do you know about what I felt or didn’t feel when I responded to his post? Everything you are saying relies on pure conjecture.
Sounds like apocrypha straight from Bishop Dennison's mouth.
The only time I can think of it happening was with Kermit Gosnell, the MD running the abortion clinic in Philadelphia.
He of course was caught and sent to prison by a DA who was a Democrat and pro choice though, so still waiting to hear about how it was endorsed by Democratic Party leaders.
For the governor of a state to actually cite this (Virginia if I’m not mistaken), I would imagine more than once. Plus the case of the nurse at a planned parenthood facility where she would routinely find whole babies left in the closet to die (in Illinois). The fact that you are trying to weigh in on the matter based on quan y and not on principle is telling enough.
Give me specific names. Which Democratic politicians have endorsed post-birth abortions?
Fallacy of causation/correlation.
Governor Cuomo (Dem - NY)
Oh yeah, the objectively horrible doctor?
Gonna call him an outlier.
When did he endorse it? Provide a quote.
Yes, the doctor who both pro choice and pro life people agree was evil.
Let's see that quote in full context.
Or is its true nature unknowable?
I’ve been consistent on my position. That you don’t believe it is another matter entirely.
Yes, consistently trying to have it both ways.
conveniently pointing out Trump's new scapegoat
Barbs like the second statement make discussion with you an annoyance. Then you wonder why people want to largely ignore conversation with you. You’re quite the jerk.
That's not Cuomo's quote.
Show the two statements side by side. And I will show you where you are mischaracterizing my position.
No... just the law that he recently repealed in NY (it allows for infanticide and does not explicitly condemn it). Kamala Harris wants California to adopt similar measures. Again leaders that “no one” is familiar with...
Why don't you do it yourself?
Why can't a person explain the basis of his disbelief but you can claim the basis of your belief is valid without any explanation?
Because you’re making me miss dinner.
Why did you lie?
Dismissive and smug.
And, here we are talking about political pet peeves again, which is unavoidable. As already said, religion is the gas-lighting vehicle.
Pheno, I read your whole reply out of respect, but we're going in circles here. Now, it wasn't god that sent COVID to avenge infanticide, but it's a man made 'choice'? That's a convenient pivot, but as you know, it still logically doesn't work out: you still pretend to know god's motives when you want to back up some argument, but when confronted with the choices of this vengeful, sick god, you pretend not to know.
And I still highlight the political pet peeve, because those go beyond your preaching room, they transform in policy that affects everyone. That's the line I draw.
And I asked you first. You’re the one that spitefully claimed I was being duplicitous. Last but not least I have given a full disclosure of my position. You can look it up if you’re that desperate about knowing where I stand. I’ve hidden nothing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)