Reply With Quote
What did I say that was wrong? You're inferring something into my post that I didn't say. 92K people should have stopped spreading the virus. Is it better to not know?
LoloooloolloooloolloolWisconsin needing to set up a field hospital is only because of increased testing
Ships in ny. Florida. Georgia Arizona...... loloooooooooolo
This guy low level
What did I say that was wrong? You're inferring something into my post that I didn't say. 92K people should have stopped spreading the virus. Is it better to not know?
My post posed a question. It didn’t infer anything.
To answer your question, what’s wrong is that you’re speculating the higher case counts are due to increased testing despite the fact positivity rates are through the roof.
Lololloolollollp
fldren folds
It's just science.
I'll rephrase for accuracy. You can hide from yourself, but you can't hide your trend of posting.
You cant hide from .01 ifr
Why would positivity rates increase? With dual testing for twindemic viruses, folks who would be asymptomatic for COVID might not be for the flu, but they get tested for both and COVID can be discovered. That stops that person from assuming they only have the flu, and they can then quarantine.
For COVID-19, data to date suggest that 80% of infections are mild or asymptomatic, 15% are severe infection, requiring oxygen and 5% are critical infections, requiring ventilation. -WHO
With the flu, as many as 50% can be asymptomatic, but that's a lot less than COVID. Twindemic testing should reveal a lot of previously undiscoverable asymptomatic positives. It doesn't rule out increased infection rate but it does add to the overall case load. I didn't address ICU case load.
edit: removed confusing/redundant half sentence
Last edited by DMC; 10-30-2020 at 07:12 PM.
Not trying to. Fatality isn't the only meaningful metric. Morbidity and permanent disability are very costly as well.
You can't hide from the caseload. It's proportional to death, suffering and the the absolute number of outlier outcomes.
When you get below the toilet paper thin surface of your rebuttals, there's nothing there to address. It's extremely easy to dismiss your retorts simply by asking you to provide something like evidence or to propose a solution. You seem to fixate on ing, not much on suggestions though. Maybe you'll find a tweet to help you.
Did the MAGA rally cause all of it? Why the increased case load? Care to explain? (this is where you flutter off again)
I know you didn’t address the increased ICU caseload. You ignored it because it’s a fact that flies in the face of your incoherent narrative about muh increased testing. That’s why I asked you a question (that you’re dodging) about it.
I proposed a solution -- not my own, essentially it's what the CDC would recommend if it didn't have its hands tied, and what other countries are doing right now -- but you seem to have ignored it in favor of ankle gnawing.
I notice you didn't have any suggestions either, maybe there's an ideological bias you can fall back on.
I didn't address the ICU case load because it's a red herring, a whataboutism. I was talking about case load, plain and simple. Do you think increased testing won't result in increased case load?
It had little or nothing to do with outdoor political rallies IMO. That's yet another strawman -- you seem to be challenged to restate what others say honestly or accurately.
There's a simple answer to this, the USA didn't try to manage the caseload in a competent or systematic way, so it blew up.
What would a competent or systematic way look like? These states that would just go along with a federal "policy" but don't have enough wherewithal to test, track and trace must be something special.
Sure, but I also think you haven’t provided anything beyond fortune cookie wisdom about “twindemics” that demonstrates increased testing is what’s driving higher case loads.
Where did I say it was because of increased testing only?
Hence, the federal coordination and financial assistance mentioned upstream.
This isn't as hard as you're trying to make this sound. You're pettifogging, as usual.
Colleges test daily. Healthy persons are deemed cases because of contact. All hospitals test anyone in the hospital. At 40ct
Colleges test daily. Healthy persons are deemed cases because of contact. All hospitals test anyone in the hospital. At 40ct
I gave you my post word for word and you say that's back pedaling? You had a goal and you weren't getting there, play the MAGA card.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Posting Permissions
