Reply With Quote
no. I've been right the whole time. Ifr less than flu.
the foldren taps out
no. I've been right the whole time. Ifr less than flu.
Shw your math
I already have.Sh
Where? Link me to the post.
should add a ChumpLov post count combining whatever chump has with pavlov's 41,902
Update (15 July 2020):::
Trump's Corona Plague dead: 140,140
Regular Flu dead: 23+k
Spanish Flu dead: 275k
Obama's H1N1 Flu dead: 12.5k
Probably no point doing a count now that Trump is censoring the numbers. Will probably just have to do the COVID death count as excess deaths going forward.
Luckily the data will be recorded to the state dashboards. Public health officials need data ASAP. Don't know what Trump's play is here. The chain of custody for the data is hospitals to country/state health department to CDC. Maybe he's planning something like "our data doesn't match the county/state level data after review, we found that 50,000 deaths never happened!"
Now the states can censor the numbers too.
True. We'll know if there's a magic decline in deaths. The math is pretty solid on how this works. Hospitalization curves follow case curves and death curves follow hospitalization curves. Ergo Texas.
Why are you treating this like an if?True. We'll know if there's a magic decline in deaths. The math is pretty solid on how this works. Hospitalization curves follow case curves and death curves follow hospitalization curves. Ergo Texas.
Hoping the hospitals will have integrity in their reporting and the local health departments will have integrity in their recording.
That's not how it works.True. We'll know if there's a magic decline in deaths. The math is pretty solid on how this works. Hospitalization curves follow case curves and death curves follow hospitalization curves. Ergo Texas.
Dr Robert Katz, founding director of the Yale‐Griffin Prevention Research Center, observed that by flattening the curve “you don't prevent deaths, you just change the dates.” But a temporary lockdown could at least prevent everyone from getting sick at once, which would be catastrophic.
If flattening the curve was the primary goal of policymakers, Sweden was largely a success. New York, on the other hand, was not, despite widespread closures and strict enforcement of social distancing policies.
The reason New York failed and Sweden succeeded probably has relatively little to do with the fact that bars and restaurants were open in Sweden. Or that New York’s schools were closed while Sweden’s were open. As Weiss explains, the difference probably isn’t related to lockdowns at all. It probably has much more to do with the fact that New York failed to protect the most at-risk populations: the elderly and infirm.
Bylines: The Washington Times, MSN.com, The Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The Federalist, the Epoch Times.
Using New York is a red herring, too. WAY more dense than even the biggest cities in Sweden. And people act like New York locked down when there was a hint of a e. They were already massively seeded by the time they locked down. Those deaths were essentially baked in. Prior, DeBlasio and the health commissioner were telling people as late as Feb to go to restaurants and take the subway. So New York's situation was a result of not locking down fast enough and encouraging activity. And talk about protecting the nursing homes.Bylines: The Washington Times, MSN.com, The Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The Federalist, the Epoch Times.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-...thorities.htmlThree-quarters of Swedes who have died have been either in nursing homes or receiving at-home care.
Um, guess why it spreads into these facilities in the first place? Because you don't in' lockdown hard enough. Staff who works at nursing home parties at the bar over the weekend, contracts it, passes it on to the residents. Not hard to understand.
Yeah DeathSentence, nothing to see here.
It's a mystery. I guess we'll never know. Just one of those things. DeSantis 2024!
Interested to hear Spurtacular's analysis of that Florida graph. Also, here's some interesting dataviz of the Florida's situation.
Yep, letting the young get back to work and life and just shelter the old, bro. Real easy to do.
I've already said the testing is whack.
The fact that they are testing healthy people should tell you how much they care about numbers.
But you should post stuff like that in the Chumpette fear porn thread. We need the
TheGreatYacht
This is how you got the name derp.
This is how you got the name cherp.
Nope, you simply don't understand simple concepts like testing asymptomatic people.
That's why you're derp.
If you gotta cry about it, go ahead. I don't think you're smart enough to improve yourself.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
