2005 Pistons should be above the Magic and Pacers without a doubt. How can you place those two pretty ty finalists over a championship tested one?
1999* Knicks
2000 Pacers
2001 Sixers
2002 Nets
2003 Nets
2005 Pistons
2007 Cavs
2009 Magic
2010 Celtics
2012 Thunder
2013 Spurs
2014 Heat
2016 Warriors
tbh:
2016 Warriors
2013 Spurs
2010 Celtics
2012 Thunder
2014 Heat
2009 Magic
2000 Pacers
2005 Pistons
2001 Sixers
2007 Cavs
2003 Nets
2002 Nets
1999* Knicks
2005 Pistons should be above the Magic and Pacers without a doubt. How can you place those two pretty ty finalists over a championship tested one?
Are they playing pussy-ball or real basketball?
Why did you skip the 04 Lakers and 06 Mavs?
Out of those listed, tbh
2016 Warriors
2010 Celtics
2001 76ers
2014 Heat
2013 Spurs
2009 Magic
2012 Thunder
2000 Pacers
2005 Pistons
2007 Cavs
2003 Nets
2002 Nets
1999* Knicks
can't score and could only defend because of gimmick physicality rules
2016 Warriors
2013 Spurs
2006 Mavs
2014 Heat
2011 Heat
2010 Celtics
2005 Pistons
2008 Lakers
2012 Thunder
2015 Cavs
2004 Lakers
2000 Pacers
2001 Sixers
2009 Magic
2007 Cavs
2003 Nets
1999 Knicks
2002 Nets
2001 Bucks were much better. Company men did a number on them.
Elite
2005 Pistons
2013 Spurs
Great
2010 Celtics
2014 Heat
2016 Warriors
Very good
2000 Pacers
1999 Knicks
2009 Magic
2012 Thunder
It does seem that LeKang and Laker rang against better teams than spur, no?
Absolutely. But these farmers don't want to discuss that
Kang was 18, 20, and 21 when he lost to spur or to teams that lost to spur for three of those rings. Not fair
The issue with Lebron is how many times he got his pushed in
MJ lost in the 1st round of the playoffs more than Bron did
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)