Reply With Quote
Bill and Melinda Gates have done some impressive things with their foundation. Haters gonna be haters but the dude is incredibly smart and has been rationally tackling some huge problems through his foundation.
I'm not semen shielding for him (I lived through Windows 3.1 and Windows 95), but the fact is there was nothing nefarious about the quote in question. People like to use it to illustrate some point that he wants to kill off part of the population, that wasn't what he meant.To add, why do so many people semen shield for Bill Gates when he brings up this stuff? Bill Gates has no training in biology.
He pushed the envelope of dishonest business practices throughout his reign at Microsoft, and then Ballmer continued the dishonesty. Microsoft products have been horrible wastes of vast amounts of manpower and hours due to incompetent design and function. Gates has shown no interest throughout his life in making people's lives better. His only goal has been to swindle more money out of people for poorly functioning software time and time again. But yes, let's make him the authority on epidemiology and medicine. rofl
funny how Windows 7 support just so happens to expire right before this crisis kicks off and everybody is working from home on their cranky, out of date system.
Bill and Melinda Gates have done some impressive things with their foundation. Haters gonna be haters but the dude is incredibly smart and has been rationally tackling some huge problems through his foundation.
Agree, but, just make out the in' check, hand it the over & don't demand in' air time as it's condition.
Alex Jones sometimes just throws stuff out there, sure. But even calling that possibility out, he does put potentially devious factions on alert. So, I'm not bothered by it.
He's set to make money too, but the work they've been doing on self-administered covid tests is remarkable. The fact that a person can do it themselves without the need to risk infecting medical personnel is pretty huge right now.
Cos the worry is that he's putting on a lab coat, looking through the microscope, and deviously designing the drugs himself?
So, you admit the man is devious AF and then you somehow want to give him a pass on a statement he clearly said, that vaccines should be designed to limit population? Let's get to the brass tacks, you're basically sperm shielding for vaccines. If you want to be for vaccines, fine; but don't give us some BS about how Bill Gates ain't trying to be a puppet master.He pushed the envelope of dishonest business practices throughout his reign at Microsoft, and then Ballmer continued the dishonesty. Microsoft products have been horrible wastes of vast amounts of manpower and hours due to incompetent design and function. Gates has shown no interest throughout his life in making people's lives better. His only goal has been to swindle more money out of people for poorly functioning software time and time again. But yes, let's make him the authority on epidemiology and medicine. rofl
did you mean to quote someone else? I'm not sure what you're talking about. When did I give him a pass on anything or vaccines?
Obviously, you haven't connected the dots if you're asking me that.
Bill Gates stated a design to use vaccines to drastically slow down population growth. You up to speed, bruh?
brah, did you take da pill and connect dem dots?
lol but snopes is a well known deep state machine, my tinfoil is off the charts when I even type that name.
Well-known sperm shielders. I have no doubt you trust them implicitly.
Well-known sperm shielders. I have no doubt you trust them implicitly.
We can't all be sperm shielders like you, bruh.
I think we're just talking past each other tbh. It seems like we're just saying the same thing.
I've already talked about it on this board how I think the idea that we'll ever get an effective vaccine for this is false. We've never even developed an effective one for the common cold or the flu. The flu shot does not come anywhere close to being an effective vaccine and tens of thousands take it every year and then still get the flu. They've been unsuccessful, to a large degree, to target the strains of flu that pop up any given year and then wonder why there are so many anti-vaxxers out there
The anti-vaxxers aren't anti-vax cos of a lack of effectiveness as it relates to the flu or whatever.
The flu vaccine is actually extremely effective. To the tune of reducing mortality rate from 1% to 0.1% (which doesn't look like much, but multiply by millions and it's a solid chunk). The fact that it's not a cure is a completely different story.
Exactly.
Now watch this fade out.
What you got Incel boy?
Post it.
Link.
He laughs at Snopes, but he puts up nothing but the chemicals exploding in his assbackward head.
Source: Madeupmonkey .com
Considering the numbers from the Spanish Flu and the current Flu have been posting ad nauseum here lately, I'm sure finding your way to the CDC isn't that difficult.
But why take science's word for it when we can come up with a great opportunistic conspiracy for idiots!
So let's get this straight...
You're an anti-vaxxer, a 9-11 troofer, you think two US presidents were killed by the CIA, (and I'm sure I'm missing some more) and you're asking for sources?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
