more experimental anecdotal treatment hype
more experimental anecdotal treatment hype
15% hospitalized
5% require vent
80% die on vent
That third number won't change, but if we can lower those first two, that would be a game changer.
Dude sounds fairly legit
The science behind his hypothesis...
https://ravikollimd.com/resources/CO...abolism_v5.pdf
Even if the blood oxygen transport was 100% efficient, the lungs filled with immune system fluids fail to exchange CO2 for O2.
HCQ suppresses immune system (ie, why auto-immune victims take it) and stops in increase of fluid in the lungs
"libertymavenstock" sounds completely legit
Might even be related to a doctor.
yeah ventilators getting a bad rap
supposedly because doctors are setting them to blow too strong, which is bad for covid patients because covid patients still have strong lung muscles.
some dra recommend having them in lowest setting
IMO I would take oxygen over ventilation. if I die I die
hopefully Porton Johnson is really on some oxygen machine and not a ventilator.
3 days of ventilation probably turns your lungs to mush
80% die on vent????? That doesn't jibe at all with Chicago Med.
"Whatever, I don’t know the full breadth and scope because I’m not a physician."
Awaiting peer review by other pilots and failed cryptocurrency exchangers.
Is 80% too low?
They really are, I can’t believe the dumb some people here going with lol. There are tons of therapeutic uses for vents that make statements like “I’ll never go on a vent” ridiculous. But realistically the majority of vents are used on people who are in crisis with very high risk of dying. So most of them die. Addendum: 80% mortality=20% survival. 20% literally snatched from death. I wish it were higher but I won’t poopoo 20% and Im sure those patients (and their families) won’t either.
Last edited by mrsmaalox; 04-08-2020 at 02:37 PM.
Do you think COVID-19 attacks the 1-Beta Chain of Hemoglobin and Captures the Porphyrin to Inhibit Human Heme Metabolism?
I think I'll read about it from a source that is something other than a pilot and failed cryptocurrency broker.
Or is that the best possible source of information according to you?
Is it?
Just say if you think this is the best you can come up with. I'll read it if you say the deleted medium entry from the pilot and failed crypto guy is the best source of information.
I eagerly await your direct answer.
I'd say 60% die on vent. Of that 60%, 95% never get off of it. So no last words, no squaring things up with loved ones.
The good news is that of the 95% of the 60% that die, about 50% of them happen to be organ donor matches for someone else in the hospital that will die in the next hour without a transplant.
The link I provided you is better tbh. I'm sure you'll read about it.
Oh, the pilot who said whatever isn't the best source?
If legit, let's see the credentials of who TF is "libertymavenst"
Even if the blood were 100% efficien for gas exchange with the lungs,
the fluid in the lungs caused by the virus in the lungs being attacked will stop the gas exchange, effectively like drowning.
With the blood oxygen transport also damaged, it's usually LIGHTS OUT.
I've seen this article already a couple times this week.
My guess is that it is being hosed all over the Internet by Trump's allies trying to get him reelected,
trying to convince people that only Trump, as he has always said, can fix problems, like solve the pandemic with HCQ and get reelected
Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-08-2020 at 05:18 PM.
You want to see his flying license?
The JOOOOOOOO FLOOOOO
What are y'all even talking about?
Dude is a pilot and failed crypto broker.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)