Reply With Quote
But that's not a goal. That's a value statement. A goal needs to be quantifiable to know you've reached it. How do you ever know you've reached the goal of limiting deaths?
So far yes.
But if the health care system gets overwhelmed, and people start dying from a lack of care that would be bad, yes? Assume that those that died from a lack of care could have been saved with intervention.
But that's not a goal. That's a value statement. A goal needs to be quantifiable to know you've reached it. How do you ever know you've reached the goal of limiting deaths?
If you're cool with abortion, you should be cool with these deaths.
Innocent lives having no choice in the matter, amirite?
People should be allowed to do what they want with their bodies, amirite?
People know the consequences of ing without basic contraception that is easily accessible and affordable, people should know the consequences of going outside. You can easily get shot, run over or struck by lighting just stepping outside. Actually, I bet the chances are higher of those things happening than catching Rona and dying from it. (One of you gerbils will go look that up, 1:1 odds)
LOL, they need more studies on the science of convenience.
He's being sarcastic.
Interesting you agree they had it coming.
Wow.
Nice to know.
I could be (and probably will be via some random, googled article) wrong, but I haven't read of ANY ERs or facilities outside of the Eastern seaboard (over populated, small geographic area in the oldest part of the country and is very, very filthy with plenty of dirty poor people) having manpower issues or being overwhelmed.
But, to be fair, I haven't seen any articles or news about GA or FL opening up two weeks ago and any high es in cases that could be related to those reopenings.
That said, doesn't mean neither is happening. Christian genocide is the most disturbing thing, and largest genocide in modern history, but it isn't reported here either. JS.
Shut up pudgy digits. I'm in charge of us.
You want a pic of me/us?
Here is my stated reason:If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.
I want to have a mutually agreed on principle to work with. No more, no less. One step at a time. Good conversations and meeting of the minds always flow from things that are mutually understood and agreed on.
If one disease is many times more deadly than another are they "just alike"?
Mutually agreed upon doesn't make it correct. How about you just stat facts as fact and opinion as opinion. I think most here can recognize facts and at least use Google as well as you.
Nah. I know we're under 200 lbs.
As an aside, the funny thing about this is that I was offered hand-modeling gigs twice. No joke. Also, had many a broad tell me my hands were incredible. Second best part of my anatomy they said.
Generally zero. *If* they can be avoided. Some people will die no matter what, so that is not entirely possible here.
If the health care system gets overwhelmed, people will die from lack of treatment that would not have died otherwise.
The goal should be to limit deaths to those which cannot be avoided. Agree? Disagree?
When you say "limit deaths", anything other than every human on earth meets that requirement. Quantify it.
goal =noun
n
\ ˈgōl , chiefly Northern US especially in senses 3b and 2a also ˈgül \
Definition of goal
1: the end toward which effort is directed
Limiting deaths to those which cannot be avoided is "an end towards which effort is directed".
It is, therefore, a goal. It is possible to work towards goals that you will never reach.
So, once again, an agreement of principle.
The goal should be to limit deaths to those which cannot be avoided. Yes? No?
If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.
Not really an answer to the question.
If one disease is many times more deadly than another are they "just alike"?
I broke a chick's hymen with my middle finger.
In what way?
You're the Leo Getz of the forum.
No. I merely took it as generally agreeing with the statement "unavoidable".
I can roll with some ambiguity as long as there is some general agreement. I would take issue with "had it coming" as being a bit callous and overly judgmental. I would though, rather keep on track. One thing at a time.
If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.
In every way.
If one disease is many times more deadly than another are they "just alike"? Yes or no.
If you have to narrow it down to single aspects in which they are "just alike," they probably aren't "just alike" overall.
But everyone knows this. Half the posts here are pulling the teeth of the omnipotents because to them agreement is defeat.
Pretty much.
The easy answer is
"No, if one disease is much more deadly than another, they are NOT "just alike" ".
Seems pretty common sense.
DMC thinks agreeing with that his personal defeat. He'll need to change the subject.
You want to nail something down on generalities? Try harder.
Bwahahahaha look at you going on and on.
Riddle me this riddle me that.
Lol. The people at risk for death of covid are the same at risk for death of the flu. Thats the fact. Same demographic
Only your ignorance of the discrepancy between what a model does and what science is keeps you from stepping away from they keyboard.
Continue to twist your previous stance into something to rectify your over reaction.
You were closer with your argument about eviction processes.
I noticed you abandoned the thread until the smoke cleared after you and Getz here said completely opposite things.
If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"?
That is not an answer to my question.
If a disease A is 12 times more deadly than disease B, are they "just alike"? Simple yes or no question.
Not until you admit what I said is a fact. The demographics of dying from covid is more like the flu, than the cdc and ChumpDumpers claim that it is more like the kansas flu.. then we can play your riddle games.
Chicken . I accept your surrender.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
