Reply With Quote
I am asking you. What do you consider to be the death rate where it's no longer a failure? Once that rate is passed, does it even matter once absolute failure is determined to have commenced?
Who are you talking to? Is that the other voice in the "we" and "us" you keep mentioning?
I am asking you. What do you consider to be the death rate where it's no longer a failure? Once that rate is passed, does it even matter once absolute failure is determined to have commenced?
you're flailing now.
I am saying you are flailing.
If people want to read it they are free to do so.
Please continue to lose your .
too ez
Whose definition of failure are you using?
Yours?
Again, you're demanding things other people have decided, if they have decided it at all.
Your losing your is not my victory. I'm merely one of the posters who asks questions you can't bring yourself to answer. Why that pisses you off is a mystery.
too ez
u drunk, nancy?
too ez
Egad. New report by cdc. Dath rate much lower than originally modeled. But who woulda thought?
You didn't make a model.
Ever.
Nope, just smart enough to not fall into the trap. But again you wouldn't know anything about that woud you Mr. Kansas or is is mr. Wetmarket?
Me 6 you 0
0-1 for you.
And you have no medical science background whatsoever.
I do. Isn't that obvious when I've been telling you how illogical your modeling beliefs are?
But go on. Its completely hilarious to watch you do this. You were wrong. So were many of the experts you were blabbering about.
And what medical science background is that?
Triggered because your wrong again. So digging deeper into desperation. Quick tell me about what you do personally and your personal background. Thats just creepy. Get over your internet Insecurities.
I don't claim any medical science background.
What's yours?
Again with the creepy internet questioning. Everyone here gets your deal. You want to be right all the time and your on a political point proving mission with your hatred of Donald trump. Why don't you stick to posting the stupid things he does instead of trying to be smart. Its not going very well for you.
Wow, you really back down when you're asked about your own claims.
I'll put you down for no medical science background.
You're 0-2.
Don't take my science background. Take the cdc who originally compared this to the kansas flu, they said spanish, and now...not so much. Back tracking....
I can't take your medical science background because you don't have one.
Cdc says you lost again.
Nope, but it's entertaining that you believe them now.
0-3.
Lol its more like they believe me. But good try.
Oh, did you contact them?
Send them your scientific paper for review?
.
Your definition.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions