Reply With Quote
Lockdowns are science. It was done in 1918!
Lol
le & authors Abstract Conflict of interest statement Figures Similar articles References LinkOut - more resources
A Study on Infectivity of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Carriers
Ming Gao et al. Respir Med. 2020.
Free PMC article Show details
Full-text linksCite
Abstract
Background: An ongoing outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread around the world. It is debatable whether asymptomatic COVID-19 virus carriers are contagious. We report here a case of the asymptomatic patient and present clinical characteristics of 455 contacts, which aims to study the infectivity of asymptomatic carriers.
Material and methods: 455 contacts who were exposed to the asymptomatic COVID-19 virus carrier became the subjects of our research. They were divided into three groups: 35 patients, 196 family members and 224 hospital staffs. We extracted their epidemiological information, clinical records, auxiliary examination results and therapeutic schedules.
Results: The median contact time for patients was four days and that for family members was five days. Cardiovascular disease accounted for 25% among original diseases of patients. Apart from hospital staffs, both patients and family members were isolated medically. During the quarantine, seven patients plus one family member appeared new respiratory symptoms, where fever was the most common one. The blood counts in most contacts were within a normal range. All CT images showed no sign of COVID-19 infection. No severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections was detected in 455 contacts by nucleic acid test.
Conclusion: In summary, all the 455 contacts were excluded from SARS-CoV-2 infection and we conclude that the infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers might be weak.
Keywords: Asymptomatic carrier; CDC, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; CHD, congenital heart disease; COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019; CT, computed tomography; Contacts; ED, emergency department; EDOU, emergency
Lockdowns are science. It was done in 1918!
Lockdowns are not science, they are responses to science.
Science is a process of attempting to know and I know you, are an idiot.
Bwahahaahah whIle society lockdowns weren't even necessary, nor are they a scientific response. Bwahahahahha
Yeah and its all perfectly variable free.
I mean its like you think ever situation in every country, county and city are perfectly the same.
You, are an idiot.
What does your science say the US death toll would be at this point without lockdowns?
Post the number and the link to your science source, please.
I imagine you'll just try to change the subject.
You said ny would need.... SHIPS.... bwahahahhaha
lol you lose by lying again
What does your science say the US death toll would be at this point without lockdowns?
Post the number and the link, please.
Now try another deflection.
Lol you said that all hospitals would be overwhelmed. And you said that was science? What happened to the science you were using? What about the science that sweden used?
Bwahahahha you can't read published journals and asked me for a lesson. Hysterical Mr. Kansas
If we had the same deaths per capita as Sweden there would be 131,000 Americans dead today. Is that what you want?
Yes or no.
lol how about that exponential growth and how sweden and Japan and others still have human beings left.
Using per capita death as evidence. Hysterical.
They have restrictions just like any other country.
I didn't use it as evidence. I used it in a hypothetical that you are afraid to answer.Using per capita death as evidence. Hysterical.
Just say you wold be OK with more deaths. Be honest.
Goal post moved. Lockdown = restrictions... bwahhahahahhahahaha
I think lockdowns would not have been as necessary if other restrictions had been put in place earlier.
The way other countries did it.
Timing matters.
Pretty simple.
King of the goalpost move. Never admits to being wrong
"but it's the other person, not me"
bwahahahahhahahah. Timing doesn't matter. Lockdowns are unnecessary. Or can you still not read the cdc reports or graphs i posted?
Lol the way other countries did it. Jesus. You were wrong about every aspect of this because you are either too dumb to read or too emotional about politics. Either way it still makes you wrong wrong wrong.
And the way you are talking sounds like trump told you and you agree. The disease can't be worse than the cure. Which there is no cure
Just because I hung my foot in your ass doesn't mean I stepped into a big hole.
What are you saying I'm wrong about, derp?
King of the goalpost move. Never admits to being wrong
Sure it does.
Lockdowns, wetmarkets, seasonal viruses, fatality rate, transmissibility rate, demographic at risk, Kansas, ny response, Japan, China,
Thats enough for now. Your 0 for life at this virus prediction.
Bwahahahahhahajajajajajajajajajajjaja not for lockdowns
Oh my goodness. You are really a flat earthen.
If you weren't wrong you wouldn't need to inch your way into another narrative by moving the goal posts.
I'm not going to give you the exit lane you so desire.
I was talking about the other measures before lockdowns, but sure-- timing matters for lockdowns too.
If you weren't wrong you wouldn't need to inch your way into another narrative by moving the goal posts.
I'm not going to give you the exit lane you so desire.
Again.
lol you've gone full derp
Shamefully he's edged his way out. Karen back to correcting grammar and asking questions with a question. Daily entertainmentIf you weren't wrong you wouldn't need to inch your way into another narrative by moving the goal posts.
I'm not going to give you the exit lane you so desire.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
