"Muh Sweden."

[tholdren]

I was talking about the other measures before lockdowns, but sure-- timing matters for lockdowns too.

Hahahhahahahhahahahajajajajajjajajahahaja

Oh Karen. Please go on

[ChumpDumper]

Shamefully he's edged his way out. Karen back to correcting grammar and asking questions with a question. Daily entertainment

Shamefully you lied and changed the subject and tried to say February was a few weeks ago. Daily entertainment.

[ChumpDumper]

Hahahhahahahhahahahajajajajajjajajahahaja

Oh Karen. Please go on

lol meltdown

[tholdren]

lol meltdown

Oh you mean you aren't going to give all that science and evidence to when whole countries need to be locked down? O was interested to learn about those things that haven't existed before right now.

[ChumpDumper]

Oh you mean you aren't going to give all that science and evidence to when whole countries need to be locked down? O was interested to learn about those things that haven't existed before right now.

you avoided every question directed at you about your science and now you're getting all pissy because you think timing isn't a factor in slowing the spread of a virus. Daily entertainment.

[DMC]

Shamefully he's edged his way out. Karen back to correcting grammar and asking questions with a question. Daily entertainment

Needs to keep going so he just fortnight builds new tangents with whataboutism and diversions. Sad life, worse than Covid I think. Certainly see though why he wants a lockdown, he's been that way for years.

[ChumpDumper]

Needs to keep going so he just fortnight builds new tangents with whataboutism and diversions. Sad life, worse than Covid I think. Certainly see though why he wants a lockdown, he's been that way for years.

you forgot what you were pretending to argue so you just fortnight build new tangents with whataboutism, diversions and personal attacks. You say people have sad lives but you spend your time trying to impress them and collect information about them.

[DMC]

^Bot response, uses words I used and just hits the quote button. Nonsensical reply. Can't think for itself.

[ChumpDumper]

^Bot response, uses words I used and just hits the quote button. Nonsensical reply. Can't think for itself.

What part did you not understand?

[tholdren]

you avoided every question directed at you about your science and now you're getting all pissy because you think timing isn't a factor in slowing the spread of a virus. Daily entertainment.

No, I said that there was not a timing issue for lockdowns, then you changed the goal post to timing to change the spread of a virus.... see what you did there.

But again, show me this evidence for lockdown, ot are you going to show the models that started this whole thing? Or your models for ny? Or your models for hispital capacity....? Or for any of the rates associated with covid.


I'll continue to wait but I'm going to start the popcorn first.

*WARNING* you have been wrong about everything continuing down this road after given evidence to balance your gossip will not end well. You are on the enemy list.

[ChumpDumper]

No, I said that there was not a timing issue for lockdowns, then you changed the goal post to timing to change the spread of a virus.... see what you did there.

I said there is.

But again, show me this evidence for lockdown, ot are you going to show the models that started this whole thing? Or your models for ny? Or your models for hispital capacity....? Or for any of the rates associated with covid.


I'll continue to wait but I'm going to start the popcorn first.

*WARNING* you have been wrong about everything continuing down this road after given evidence to balance your gossip will not end well. You are on the enemy list.

Sorry, I've been waiting for your science and numbers for weeks. All I get is gossip and subject changes.

Please post your science based numbers saying what the number of deaths would be today without any lockdowns whatsoever in the United States. Your claim is they were not necessary so support your claim with science.

I know you have an enemies list and you get really flustered and emotional when asked for simple things like I asked for above, but just calm down and give it a try.

[tholdren]

I said there is.

Sorry, I've been waiting for your science and numbers for weeks. All I get is gossip and subject changes.

Please post your science based numbers saying what the number of deaths would be today without any lockdowns whatsoever in the United States. Your claim is they were not necessary so support your claim with science.

I know you have an enemies list and you get really flustered and emotional when asked for simple things like I asked for above, but just calm down and give it a try.

Get this book, it's called semantics of science. Then read it. Its better than Googling out of context hogwash

[ChumpDumper]

Get this book, it's called semantics of science. Then read it. Its better than Googling out of context hogwash

I'm not asking for a book recommendation.

I am asking you this:

Please post your science based numbers saying what the number of deaths would be today without any lockdowns whatsoever in the United States. Your claim is they were not necessary so support your claim with science.

If you can't do this, just say so. It's really OK if you can't. I don't think I'm asking too much of you.

[tholdren]

I'm not asking for a book recommendation.

I am asking you this:

Please post your science based numbers saying what the number of deaths would be today without any lockdowns whatsoever in the United States. Your claim is they were not necessary so support your claim with science.

If you can't do this, just say so. It's really OK if you can't. I don't think I'm asking too much of you.

I find it odd that you claim to be in favor of science, yet you've made some completely wrong claims without even doing research. That's weird. Oh yeah because you're not using science you using typical karen gossip

[ChumpDumper]

.

You keep changing the subject to me.

I am asking you this about your claims and what you claim is science:

Please post your science based numbers saying what the number of deaths would be today without any lockdowns whatsoever in the United States. Your claim is they were not necessary so support your claim with science.

Just calm down and answer. It should be really easy for you.

[pgardn]

Just because I hung my foot in your ass doesn't mean I stepped into a big hole.

You have embarrassed yourself.
you don’t know when to stop PhD recruiter.

You really think anyone believes this?

[apalisoc_9]

you forgot what you were pretending to argue so you just fortnight build new tangents with whataboutism, diversions and personal attacks. You say people have sad lives but you spend your time trying to impress them and collect information about them.

He's obese.

[apalisoc_9]

You have embarrassed yourself.
you don’t know when to stop PhD recruiter.

You really think anyone believes this?

Obese re ...That is DMC for you.

[ChumpDumper]

He's obese.

And really sensitive about it.

[tholdren]

You keep changing the subject to me.

I am asking you this about your claims and what you claim is science:

Please post your science based numbers saying what the number of deaths would be today without any lockdowns whatsoever in the United States. Your claim is they were not necessary so support your claim with science.

Just calm down and answer. It should be really easy for you.

Lol lockdown science..... can't read nor do you understand data. Wrong again

[ChumpDumper]

Lol lockdown science..... can't read nor do you understand data. Wrong again

You keep ting yourself.

I am asking you this about your claims and what you claim is science:

Please post your science based numbers saying what the number of deaths would be today without any lockdowns whatsoever in the United States. Your claim is they were not necessary so support your claim with science.

Just calm down and answer. It should be really easy for you.

Show me how right you are about everything and post your science number.

[tholdren]

You keep ting yourself.

I am asking you this about your claims and what you claim is science:

Please post your science based numbers saying what the number of deaths would be today without any lockdowns whatsoever in the United States. Your claim is they were not necessary so support your claim with science.

Just calm down and answer. It should be really easy for you.

Show me how right you are about everything and post your science number.

That's a lot of words for a person who has never been correct on anything he's said about the virus. Probably because you can't read the science that comes out. You still get your science from Twitter? Lol mr kansas

[ChumpDumper]

That's a lot of words for a person who has never been correct on anything he's said about the virus. Probably because you can't read the science that comes out. You still get your science from Twitter? Lol mr kansas

I asked you for a number.

You yourself.

That's pretty much it.

lol you

[tholdren]

I asked you for a number.

You yourself.

That's pretty much it.

Tell me more about Wetmarkets. I recall you saying those were only in China... . Bwahahhaaha

[ChumpDumper]

Tell me more about Wetmarkets. I recall you saying those were only in China... . Bwahahhaaha

The wet markets where the virus were transmitted were in China.

You're ting yourself.

You have no numbers.

You never had any numbers.

lol you