Reply With Quote
This is a bad ankle biting job. I refer you to cherp. This is his contention.
So, somehow exposed to it, but not really exposed to it.
What were these foreign govts. gonna blackmail him about?
This is a bad ankle biting job. I refer you to cherp. This is his contention.
You can't even grasp the concept of exposure.
What are you doing here?
He wasn't exposed except by the deep state in a desperate coup attempt.
he exposed himself to a felony conviction.
Seriously have no idea what you are talking about. (shrugs)
Don't care much either. If you can't explain what you mean, that is on you.
Yea, you seriously had no idea when you chimed in with ankle biting. That's pretty much the point, dip .
I'm not in favor of the FBI wielding so much power that they think they can lie to you and it's nothing; and you "lie" to them about nothing meaningful and it's a felony.
I know you love the police state, cherp. That's your deal.
"about nothing"
derp loves lying
What was hurt by Flynn's alleged lie, cherp?
derp loves lying
What's the damages?
Seriously, if you're interested in the case, read about it. I'm not going to spoon feed you.
You won't read about it. You're only interested in men here.
That's a nice distraction.
Seriously, if you're interested in the case, read about it. I'm not going to spoon feed you.
You won't read about it. You're only interested in men here.
What's the damages that justifies a felony charge, cherp?
Why are you incapable of looking anything up, derp?
Explain why you need to be spoon fed every detail of this case.
Translation:
ummm. sure.ARGLE BARGLE DOODLE DEE.
So, you don't have damages outside of hurt feelings.
Damages? This isn't a slander suit, counsleor.So, you don't have damages outside of hurt feelings.
I said you can answer your own questions if you look it up.
Will you do that?
Yes or no.
English common law, for which US law is based, is designed to recompense damages.Damages? This isn't a slander suit, counsleor.
I said you can answer your own questions if you look it up.
Will you do that?
Yes or no.
It's not about witch hunts.
Criminal law is the same principle mostly.
Some of it is preventive; but there's just nothing that justifies lying to the FBI on an innocuous matter as being felonious.
And at this point, he's been plenty punished anyways. This is a clear case of heavy handedness.
They're embroiled in a political witch hunt. They're doing a lot of damage to the agency with this bull .
No. That's why it's a separate area of law.
Criminal law isn't based on political witch hunts. What's the damages?
Not at all. Criminal law is supposed to serve society. How is society being served by this witch hunt?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions