Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 93
  1. #51
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,002
    Neutral laws of general applicability are the name of the game. Prohibitions on religious gatherings, that don’t target any specific religion and that are passed on neutral criteria like size of the gathering, pass first amendment muster. You can’t say that the prohibition targets any specific religion.

    Derp esq’s take is tantamount to saying churches don’t need to satisfy fire code. This buffoon is literally re ed.
    Last edited by vy65; 05-24-2020 at 07:57 PM.

  2. #52
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,002
    Vy65 is more succinct in his comforting himself.
    Scrah, who taught your con law class?

  3. #53
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,002
    Lol derp esq, so wrong about literally everything, especially the “permanent cons ution”

    That notion is literally the opposite of the very first thing they teach you in con law - judicial review

  4. #54
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    Lol derp esq, so wrong about literally everything, especially the “permanent cons ution”

    That notion is literally the opposite of the very first thing they teach you in con law - judicial review
    Permanent outside of amendments. Don't get desperate, scrah.

  5. #55
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,002
    Permanent outside of amendments. Don't get desperate, scrah.
    Wrong

  6. #56
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,002
    Of course this ing coward derp won’t answer with anything of substance. He’ll respond with inane and blatantly wrong statements of law, and keep running away when called out on it. Because he’s a moronic coward that should shut the up about things he clearly knows nothing about, like cons utional law

  7. #57
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    Cos muh activist judges

    Scrah

  8. #58
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Sorry but this is ing stupid.

  9. #59
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,031
    Derp has never had a woman and never will.

    Can’t even nail the church lady.

  10. #60
    NostraSpurMus phxspurfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    14,364
    Pretty much all churches/denominations have online services now. Do churches just want money from donations from weekly services?

  11. #61
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,002
    If you could legal terms into a woman with Down’s syndrome, derp would be her son

  12. #62
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    Sorry but this is ing stupid.

  13. #63
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    Chumpettes: You have e-church.com

  14. #64
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    Of course this ing coward derp won’t answer with anything of substance. He’ll respond with inane and blatantly wrong statements of law, and keep running away when called out on it. Because he’s a moronic coward that should shut the up about things he clearly knows nothing about, like cons utional law
    Would love to see a reality show where he tries to defend himself in court, tbh... "you're an activist judge! Ron Paul says the cons ution blah blah blah"

  15. #65
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,235
    Sorry but this is ing stupid.
    your hero is talking about you, derp

  16. #66
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    your hero is talking about you, derp
    Mind Reader Cuckold

  17. #67
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,235
    Mind Reader Cuckold
    Why don't you send out another derp bat signal to him and find out.

  18. #68
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    Why don't you send out another derp bat signal to him and find out.
    I thought you just told me. You backing off that?

  19. #69
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,235
    I thought you just told me. You backing off that?
    It's your thread. He said it's stupid in plain English. I don't need any more confirmation that that.

  20. #70
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    It's your thread. He said it's stupid in plain English. I don't need any more confirmation that that.
    He could've been referring to any number of things, no?

    You really need a w; but it ain't coming, is it?

  21. #71
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    Supreme Court sides with California's religious gathering limit, rejects church's claim

    In a 5-4 decision Friday, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s guidance to restrict religious gatherings.

    The court denied injunctive relief for South Bay United Pentecostal Church. Justices cast significant doubt on the church’s case, siding with state guidelines that limit attendance in places of worship to 25% or a maximum of 100 attendees.

    https://www.wyff4.com/article/suprem...claim/32717863

  22. #72
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,235
    Supreme Court sides with California's religious gathering limit, rejects church's claim

    In a 5-4 decision Friday, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s guidance to restrict religious gatherings.

    The court denied injunctive relief for South Bay United Pentecostal Church. Justices cast significant doubt on the church’s case, siding with state guidelines that limit attendance in places of worship to 25% or a maximum of 100 attendees.

    https://www.wyff4.com/article/suprem...claim/32717863
    Lol John Roberts siding with the libs. I honestly thought he would back the church on this one.

  23. #73
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    Lol John Roberts siding with the libs. I honestly thought he would back the church on this one.
    The funny thing is that even the dissent didn't claim Newsom didn't have authority to do that, just that he should've applied the same rules as other businesses.

  24. #74
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,026
    Lol derp esq, so wrong about literally everything, especially the “permanent cons ution”

    That notion is literally the opposite of the very first thing they teach you in con law - judicial review
    brah derp believes the cons ution allows POTUS to fire supreme court justices at will

  25. #75
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    brah derp believes the cons ution allows POTUS to fire supreme court justices at will
    Damn, John Roberts going innnnn....

    The Governor of California’s Executive Order aims to limit the spread of COVID–19, a novel severe acute respir-atory illness that has killed thousands of people in California and more than 100,000 nationwide.

    Get in here Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •