Reply With Quote
Not to drink.
You're fine with old married white men giving interns who can't drink all the alcohol they can so old men can have sex with them.
You're defending it.
Cheering it on.
You'd be fine with it if the girl was 17.
lol
She was of legal age. You're mad because you just found out.you're fine with your old men giving underage interns alcohol.
lol!
Not to drink.
You're fine with old married white men giving interns who can't drink all the alcohol they can so old men can have sex with them.
You're defending it.
Cheering it on.
You'd be fine with it if the girl was 17.
lol
Did you know kids can drink when they are with their parents at home. Oh the outrage! Just admit you dropped a dud.
"condemn this"
Were her parents there when he liquored her up and had sex with her, Qhris?
Did he have sex in front of her parents at their home?
Yes or no.
Rofl Chris is actually condoning thisDid you know kids can drink when they are with their parents at home. Oh the outrage! Just admit you dropped a dud.
"condemn this"
"....
“As a bold and brave Christian-Conservative, I will stand up to Government abuse, constant overstepping and the over all burden it places on the taxpayer...."
https://bryanslaton.com/
of course
She was a consenting adult. People sneak in to bars and clubs all the time.
"condemn this"
Ol' pervy Qhris folds.She was a consenting adult. People sneak in to bars and clubs all the time.
"condemn this"
Chris really reaching now to shield his red team leaders.
Talking about cults...
Judge in Proud Boys trial rejects claims of government misconduct
District Court Judge Tim Kelly knocked down a series of thinly premised but eye-popping allegations.
Prosecutors did not withhold or “suppress” Jan. 6 security footage — aired in February by Tucker Carlson — from the Proud Boys now on trial for seditious conspiracy, a federal judge ruled late Sunday.
U.S. District Court Judge Tim Kelly used his 10-page order to knock down a series of thinly premised but eye-popping allegations lodged by one of those defendants, Dominic Pezzola, in recent weeks.
In fact, Kelly wrote, Pezzola’s lawyers have had access to most of the footage since September 2021 and the rest since early 2023, far enough in advance for Pezzola to use at trial. But Kelly also noted that there’s simply no indication that any of the footage is exculpatory for Pezzola, who helped ignite the breach of the Capitol building when he smashed a Senate-wing window with a stolen police riot shield.
“Pezzola has not shown how any of this relates to an element of an offense with which he is charged — or how it relates to him at all,” Kelly wrote, adding, “Nor has the evidence been suppressed. As the Court has already explained to Pezzola, he cannot base a [suppression] claim on information he has long possessed.”
As the trial of five Proud Boys — including former national chairman Enrique Tarrio — inches toward a conclusion this week, Kelly sidelined several of the most sensational allegations that Pezzola’s attorneys had lodged. Among them: that prosecutors had destroyed evidence related to the case, that they coerced false guilty pleas from other Proud Boys and that they doctored at least one report from an informant to obscure an FBI agent’s involvement.
Kelly summed up his response to these claims in a section of his order headlined: “There Is No Evidence of Government Misconduct, Let Alone Misconduct Warranting Dismissal, a Mistrial, or Other Sanctions,”
Kelly described Pezzola’s theories as “bizarre,” based on “conjecture” and other times not based on anything at all.
“At bottom, not one of Pezzola’s contentions withstands scrutiny,” Kelly wrote. “His factual premises lack support, and his legal premises cannot be squared with case law.”
In his order, Kelly also rejected claims that prosecutors had improperly withheld key evidence in the case by claiming it was classified. The Justice Department worked frantically to reclaim 80 lines of internal FBI messages that it had inadvertently provided to the defense lawyers in the case, saying they were never meant to be turned over and were likely classified. The effort prompted defense lawyers to raise questions about whether prosecutors were seeking to seal away significant exculpatory evidence under the guise of a classification issue.
Kelly rejected this speculation in his order, contending that they had no bearing on the defense’s case at all.
“The Court has reviewed the 80 messages produced to it in camera and finds — regardless of whether they were properly classified or even properly categorized as law-enforcement sensitive — that the Government had no duty to produce them to the defendants in the first place,” he wrote.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/0...uling-00092276
You think anyone here is a "Proud Boy"?
We have some proud boyz stans here, bending over to defend them for the failed Jan 6th coup.... it is what it is...You think anyone here is a "Proud Boy"?
Do we have any Nancy, FBI, and Antifa stans here too who defend their failed Jan 6th coop?
That dude has always irked me... His look just screams weirdo or wannabe Sammy Davis. Both the same tbh.
Why would the left want a coup on 1/6? They had just won everything in the election. Makes no sense.Do we have any Nancy, FBI, and Antifa stans here too who defend their failed Jan 6th coop?
This might be literally the dumbest conspiracy theory of all time seeing as how many names and videos we have of the event.
More projection and avoidance from the stupidest political bloc in this country's history.
Coup isn't really the word I wanted to use but I like using the same language some here use against them. Is PsyOp better for you then?
Says the puto who hides behind multiple alts. You probably believe you're a "them/they" too.
That makes no sense either. The Democrats had just won everything. There was no reason to deviate from just taking power as usual.
The only thing that absolutely makes sense is that some right wingers couldn't take the L and were trying to change the result.
Well you look like a she but identify as a he but nobody here has a problem with calling you thatSays the puto who hides behind multiple alts. You probably believe you're a "them/they" too.
I def don't look like a she... Oh it's because I have long hair well buddy many dudes have long hair too. You look like a little and I don't mind calling you that because it's exactly who you are little cuck.
qhris thinks getting a teenager drunk to have sex with them is no biggie
^
JK tell it to your boyfriend Bene. IDGAF what you putos have to say. Big tough putos who'll never show their face.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
