Why do you sperm shield so hard for patently unfair things?
Why do you sperm shield so hard for patently unfair things?
I'm just trolling Qhris...
Pity nod and pat on the back.
You're admitting it, Qhris.
"legalinsurrection.com"
Another own-goal from the radical insurrectionist party.
Biden president, not Trump.
Trump will always be the lowest bar.
So you can hack a pipeline, but not an election? Got it!
So you can prove a pipeline was hacked, but not the election? Got it!
i dislike jenner for her politics
you dislike her for her gender
see how simple that is?
Gotheem!
Election hacking was mainstream religion for four solid years. Now, its blasphemy.
demanding evidence bad now
how did people allege that the 2016 election was hacked? did anybody claim that the machines were literally rigged and stealing votes?
I know a fallback argument when I see one.
how much more of a fallback argument is there than "if you dont support jenner for governor then that means trans people bad now"
I was talking about the controversy over Diebold. There was an Emmy winning do entary about it called "Hacking Democracy"
The four years of Russia collusion conspira s didn't help, tho.
According to what?
Such a common attack these days from Liberals/Democrats tbh...
"You're racist, you're transphobic beep boop"
Get a grip.
great question!
for starters, what is jenner's gender again?
when you said "hacking elections" was mainstream for 4 years, i was assuming you meant post-2016, so i dont know what a do entary made in 2006 has to do with that.
how did people claim that the 2016 election was hacked?
I might be wtong about this, but i believe the technical assessment of the 2016 hacking was withheld in deference to the states, implausible as that sounds.
Jennifer Cohn talks about this.
Let's not take the long way around. Your fallback argument is that a conservative can't support a trans candidate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)