^^^ came up empty on scripture
I'm not going to do your homework for you.
God Bless
^^^ came up empty on scripture
^^^ignorant, uses English IV vocab to make it seem like he said something profound
still no scripture, simple Chris. it's not anybody else's job to back up your bs.
I corrected Lambert. Not my job to fetch scripture on demand.
God Bless.
white flag waving proud
twisting yourself up into a pretzel with that last comment
conservatives aren't accepting of trans people, but they're also very tolerant and accepting of others!
you'd be the expert, as the guy who's actually faced multiple twitter suspensions for bot-like behavior
There's no homework to be done. This is easy for anyone who has read a shred of scripture. You haven't read , you just want to belong to something. I feel sorry for you. Perhaps someday you'll find your purpose. Maybe it's not being an unpaid bot wannabe living in mom's basement.
Claims to be Christian.
Thinks finding scriptural reference to Catholicism is homework.
:lmao
Fraud. How ing pathetic
Beep boop eating fake news per par
Not "conservatives" but conservatism as in the party ideology. You mincing words isn't my problem bro; maybe you should've had your paralegal explain it to you since you're too dense to figure it out yourself.
poor fella
you said "the backbone of the party isn't for the trans community"
the backbone of the party would be "conservatives"
you then later said "that's not to say conservatives aren't tolerating and accepting though"
so for both points you referred to conservatives, the people. not "conservatism"
This is you not winning again. You're doing a lot of these not winning displays lately.
There's a fallacy in there somewhere.
Person A is a conservative
Person A is not tolerant and accepting of transsexuals
Ergo conservatives are not tolerant and accepting of transsexuals
Wonder how that works with liberals...
Maxine Waters is a democrat
Maxine Waters called for violence against police
Democrats called for violence against police
Also, there's a difference between "for" and "accepting of".
Are you for your MIL living with you?
Would you be accepting of her if she showed up?
Come on Philo, these are strip mall lawyer level fallacies
Last edited by DMC; 05-14-2021 at 04:14 PM.
i never made this claim. in fact, i said this:
all i was doing in the conversation you jumped into was point out the inconsistency of koriwhat's comment about how conservatives dont accept trans people but also that conservatives are accepting of others
Your interpretation of backbone is the people and not my interpretation which is the ideology behind the party itself. Again, it's not my fault you mince words or interpret them differently from myself. Maybe you should ask me to explain what I mean first instead of jumping to conclusions like you always do.
It's like people crying about church goers being phobic when the majority of them aren't yet their religion itself looks down on sexuals.
Keep moving goal posts all you'd like but this is why I don't care to deal with you much bro.
so the backbone of the party is not people. ok then.
but i still fail to see how this even makes a difference. if the ideology behind the party is not accepting of trans people, doesnt this necessarily manifest in some people of the party, ie conservatives, also not being accepting of trans people?
"Some" is the key word but not the majority of folks just like church goers bro.
Btw, when I said "backbone" I meant the ideology itself behind that party and I doubt it was that dubious you couldn't understand where I was coming from. Either way it doesn't matter.
your sympathy for Beep Boop is touching
Don't drag other discussions into this. I wasn't referring to your long game. I am talking about that particular response.
Your response doesn't indicate that conclusion at all, given the fallacies you employed.
You being exposed somehow indicates support for someone else. Must be nice to have that ivory tower of emotional security.
Oh look, more new words for your bingo card.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)