It's actually on CNN. But does anyone know how to read articles anymore or do we just read headlines?
Here's a red flag:
The 13.5% number for Hydroxy alone doesn't make sense when we have a 20.1% figure when azithromycin. You'd expect the control with azithromycin would be the same as hydroxy alone, since azithromycin has similar side effects as Hydroxy. This seems like "noisy data" to me.
Yep:
Before the conspiri deflections happen, the researchers of this study admit as such.
What's the problem here? Selective sampling. Quote:
Dear Leader was touting it as a game changing miracle drug and this study actually contradicts that. It seems the researchers of this study have concluded that it MIGHT work for SPECIFIC patients.
To throw more cold water on this, the UK study that featured 11,000 test subjects and was performed as a real clinical trial found:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/02/healt...udy/index.html
: you're just skeptical because Lord Trump promoted the drug.
Yes, I'm sure the UK study that found no benefit is also part of the "deep state" figuring out how to harm Lord Trump. The primary issue with touting this drug when there is yet NO evidence that it works is because it caused a run on it that left Lupus patients and others who actually need facing shortages.
https://www.npr.org/2020/04/01/82505...n-short-supply
And now I suspect there to be another run. Unacceptable when the science isn't settled. But I know the base is desperate for a Trump win, which is all they care about.