Reply With Quote
It's 100% effective in preventing severe illness and hospitalization. Hopefully crooked Fauci and company don't delay it's approval here.
Thinking it's simple math and extrapolating how long it will take to vaccinate the population is what makes it a stupid narrative. Right now they are being very selective in who gets the vaccine. That means identifying the people and then scheduling a time for the vaccination. Once enough doses are available for widespread vaccinations to start the pace will pick up.
It's 100% effective in preventing severe illness and hospitalization. Hopefully crooked Fauci and company don't delay it's approval here.
Monoclonal antibody treatments sitting on shelves unused
Damn shame
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...used-hospitals
CVS shelves.
Yeah my wife has been sending people. Takes up a lot of her time talking to the patients about what the treatment is and undoing what they have been told by er & urgent care docs who are sending them home with ivermectin, steriods, and a grab bag of other instead of sending them for antibody infusion. She's pretty pissed about it because these people are losing days after diagnosis which lowers the efficacy of the antibodies.
One thing that concerns me is they don't know for sure how long the vaccine lasts. So that one might have to get another vaccine in a year.
But are there any side effects related to getting two different types of vaccines? So the first year, it might be the Pfizer vaccine but the next year, the Moderna. Or Astra Zeneca or whatever.
They couldn't possibly have figured out by now if there are any associated issues in that situation.
Good to hear that she is getting her patients the treatment.
The only demo that needs the vax is 65 plus. The end. Worst states in us are lockdown and mask mandated, just like countries. Its a virus. Its seasonal. It is only a real danger to those already old and severely ill
Where did you get your MPH?
The guys on TWiV think it's a pretty good guess that the mRNA vaccines will need a boost every 3 years. They're making an educated guess but still a guess. They seem to think the viral vector vaccines like Astrazeneca's will not provide protection for quite as long as the mRNA ones.
I don't understand what the concern is with possibly needing a booster shot somewhere down the road is or why people would not get vaccinated because they might need a booster shot someday.
Pretty simple way of looking at it is you are going to get infected repeatedly for the rest of your life or you can get vaccinated repeatedly for the rest of your life so you can choose the vaccine or the virus.
Credentialism? Lol. Mph takes how many stats classes? How many of health department employees have mph? Not even all states have health department directors with an mph.
Not that it even matters.
Dumb argument considering epidemiologists disagree on severity of disease. You are truly low.level
Where did you get your MD?
She had one last week diagnosed on Sunday who was an entire checklist of high risk factors over 65, black, diabetic, hypertension, etc. When she talked to her on Monday the person didn't want the treatment because covid is a hoax. She called her on Wednesday and the person was feeling worse but still not willing to get the treatment. So she told told them if you change your mind by 4pm let me know but after that I'm off until Monday and by then you won't qualify for treatment anymore. Lady called back like 15 minutes later, okay I'll go get it lol
Lolooooooooooloooloolo
Credentialism > logic.
Bwahahahahahahahahhahahahahah
Chumpdump low level
My concern was regarding side effects of getting one type of vaccine (mRNA) and then going back the next year and getting a different type from a different manufacturer.
Why wouldn't your concern be that an mrna vax, this one, is not proven to prevent the spread of covid or get covid?
Pretty dumb to take if you're under 60.
I also didn't list my concern with the Zeke contract.
Or the irregular mole on my calf.
Or that I'm having trouble finding a comfortable shoe.
Shouldn't make a difference on the mRNA's because it will be the same vaccine. Pfizer & Moderna are using the same mRNA, only difference is their lipid carrier. The viral vector vaccines they will have to change the vector every year because you will have antibodies to the vector which will make the vaccine ineffective. So for example, astrazenca uses a chimpazee adenovirus to carry the coronavirus e so next time around they have to use a different adenovirus (or something) because you will be immune to the chimpanzee virus.
Mixing/matching vaccines over time won't really make a difference because they all are targeting immunity to only the e protein. So they're doing the same thing just in a different manner. That's just for these first vaccines. When/if the live attenuated virus vaccines come out it may matter but personally I wouldn't get an attenuated vaccine until there's a bunch more data. I think the sinovac vaccine is a killed whole virus, I'd be hesitant about that one too.
I think the mRNA vaccines are going to rule the day eventually, at least for covid. They are so easy to change if the coronavirus e changes. All they have to do is change the mRNA but the platform doesn't change so it won't need as much testing.
The mole is probably nothing. Best to just let it grow instead of getting it checked out. You should be fine.
Thanks. That's what I've been doing. What about the Zeke contract?
I don't know what that is. Probably fine though, wait and see approach also recommended.
Less concerning than a mrna vax that hasn't proven to do a thing and been given mainly to the most not at risk age groups after 20 less
Well...as of now, I'm not scheduled to get a vax. So the Zeke contract is pretty concerning to me. He's likely peaked already and they haven't even started paying him on his new deal.
How is that good? They shouldn't have rewarded him 2 years in advance. Now they're stuck with him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
