because those ones use the RNA technology, and this one doesn't, that's why it doesn't need to be antarctic temps.
All along Phizer and Moderna were reported as being in the 90s +
because those ones use the RNA technology, and this one doesn't, that's why it doesn't need to be antarctic temps.
In 44000 volunteers
After day 28, no one who got vaccinated needed hospitalization or died regardless of whether they were exposed to “regular COVID or these particularly nasty variants,”
50% efficacy beats none by a lot
if our best vaccine had 51% efficacy we'd still be glad to have it.
You weren’t kidding. She had a bad time. Aches all over, some nausea, chills
Inside haters head: “ooh. yeah. just like that”
For someone without an underlying condition. A 66 percent efficacy + your immune system defense is actually really good imo.
sometimes not emphasized is protection against infection. the J&J jab decreases severe disease progression by 85%.
I wouldnt. 50% means pandwmic would rage on indefinitely
When did everybody start calling it a jab?
I think the same is true with 95%, you can still get infected, and feel like , esp if heavily infected, for a day or more while the immune system, innate and acquired, attacks the virus, but will not progress to serious symptoms.
It sounds to me like vaccinated people could still get infected, have symptoms like some people do after 2nd shot.
J&J type vaccines are good enough for most people and should really accelerate our way to herd immunity. The advantage of its convenience can't be overstated.
alliterative
J&J jab
They've been using it for all vaccines. I first saw it in the Daily Mail some weeks ago but was wondering if it was in wide use earlier.
Someone without underlying conditions already has 95+% efficacy vs the virus.
Tbqh
Depends on your age
Isnit really much lower for 65+ with no underlying?
I thought not
not really. they're very likely to survive, but theres a litany of long term effects that this virus can cause as well
Dont disagree. But would like to see stats of what % ppl without underlying conditions have severe lomg term effects
maybe you should do that before claiming everybody will be fine
95% is not everybody, Nancy
It's better efficacy than flu vaccines
And 100% effective in preventing hospitalization and death which is what really matters.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)