Reply With Quote
Meanwhile they’re fine with “herd mentality” and “Thighland”
Like any other Trump ups.
Expect anything else from Trumpsters?
Meanwhile they’re fine with “herd mentality” and “Thighland”
[goes into voting booth]
damn biden said 2 millions will die by the end of his speech, ummm better vote for that other guy who has actually let hundreds of thousands died.
Ifr just went sky high. Too bad 2/3 of America dead. But all of spurstalk survived
hahahahaha
lol "us"
Our next POTUS
And if Trump had told people to wear masks, not one of those 200 million would have died!!
Good ol Dimentia Joe seemed pretty ing sharp here
oh wait..this is the thread for cherry picking things to make him look awful. my bad
Dementia support group has arrived
It’s still would have been disastrousAnd if Trump had told people to wear masks, not one of those 200 million would have died!!
but purposely trying to set people against each other for something as simple as a mask?
that’s one ed up leader. UNITED STATES
what do you wish to replace the word united with?
Do you think Trump will lower the dementia meter?
and then there’s the child care problem...
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/21/polit...sin/index.html
Dementia or not, Biden isn't letting the SCOTUS circus control his talking points, and is still running a very focused campaign targeted at midwestern white voters. He held the "I'm a state school graduate from Scranton and Trump is an Ivy League trust fund baby" zinger in his back pocket and is now just starting to roll it out for the debates. Great strategy and discipline you wouldn't have seen from Shillary.
Yeah English isn't your native language.
Obama was an Ivy Leaguer as well though.
Which is fine, a lot of the Midwestern white voters went from Obama to Trump because they were (rightfully) disappointed with Obama for not doing more to help the working class. It's a good way for Biden to differentiate himself from your typical Ivy League establishment Democrat.
He'd be wise to not do that since the only reason he's even on the ticket is his ties with Obama. Joe has had 40 years to build a resume in congress and the WH. If he needs to go back to college to beat a neophyte like Trump, that's not good.
All the polling data suggests he's making inroads with the working class whites who hated Hillary, so I'm not sure what makes it unwise. He's not getting your vote either way.
The same polls that suggested Hillary had a 98% chance of winning in 2016?
Imagine how dumb you are.
Haters a fraud and an anti American troll. You are just a terrible terrible person.
ah good you’re to trumper talking points. You just can’t help yourself. You’ve proven to be as fraud and liar. You were scared for being called out But you can’t help yourself and your truth.
it’s why spurtacular is so important to you. He’s all you have.
No, not the same polls actually (fivethirtyeight also gave Hillary a 71.8% chance).
Prior to 2016, there wasn't a substantial delta between how educated whites and uneducated whites voted, it was roughly the same percentage Republican and Democrat. Trump changed that, but the polls didn't factor it in. College educated whites are more likely to respond to polls than non-college educated whites, so the 2016 polls overrepresented the group that favored Clinton and underrepresented the group that favored Trump. The pollsters this year are now weighing education when they select a sample, so they have more uneducated white voter representation than the 2016 polls did.
The other difference is that Shillary might have been winning in the polls by a plurality, but she was always below 50% in the key states and didn't consider the possibility that undecided voters would coalesce around Trump which is what happened. For example, at this time in 2016, her polling average in Wisconsin was 47.6% vs. 44.3% for Trump. Biden's polling average is at 49.7% in PA vs. 45.2% for Trump. It's also 49.9% in Michigan and 50.1% in Wisconsin. Not only are the polls this year weighing demographics more accurately than they did in 2016, but Biden is much closer to the magic 50% number than Hillary ever was.
Aren't you using circular reasoning to say the polls are more accurate? What are you using as a standard other than the polls themselves? I can understand they are being more specific, but how does specificity equate to accuracy?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
