Where's the legal right for shooting two people after you needlessly shot someone else in the head?
i cannot believe some re s get shot and now basketball is canceled
this country and this year man
Where's the legal right for shooting two people after you needlessly shot someone else in the head?
How so? Say I'm walking home, see this kid shoot someone in the head, then start chasing him to try and disarm/stop him? Is it self defense if he shoots me in the head?
Open carry is legal in Wisconsin... If he's not actively committing a crime, your supposed to leave it up to the cops (good luck with the whole abolish the cops thing...).
At least not as well as the video of him shooting the other two.
probably didnt expect someone to attack him, because he has a legal and moral right to defend himself however he sees fit, no matter how much they dislike him or find him 'provocative'
esp since you know he has a ing gun and clearly wasn't too pussy to use it
I did make my stance. And yes by not committing crimes will greatly reduce your chances of not getting killed by cops. It's simple logic and it goes for any race that commits crimes. Blacks lack any accountability. Everything is whites fault. Just think if he didn't molest an under aged girl and fight with police and then obviously going to get something out of his car he wouldn't be in the hospital now would he? For your information, they do the same to hispanics and whites. You are a sick individual thinking that I want black people killed and for you wanting cops to be killed. What about the black cop that shot the black guy that was chasing him with a knife a couple weeks ago. I bet you think that was justified because the cop was black don't you?
sure but dont cry when your assumption ends up being absolutely wrong and you get waxed trying to avenge a ing violent c
The video is what is going to exonerate him on the murder charge. Gun charges will probably stick but the murder charge will probably be dropped before a trial...if it goes to trial because of some DA trying to make a political statement...he'll be found not guilty.
He is too young to open carry in Wisconsin. He was a pussy who illegally brought a gun to agitate angry protesters and ended up shooting 3 people.
You know he's going to prison right?
Open carry is legal for a minor? I thought that was only over the age of 18.
open carry is illegal huh?
how about burning and looting private property? is that illegal too?
funny the types you find sympathy with, the absolute trash of humanity
It's not.
so is it okay to attack someone if they agitate you?
guess we'll have to seriously rewrite case law so we can pussy out for protestors
By law he was not allowed to have a gun there at his age in Wisconsin.
Law and order bad now?
He'll be found guilty on the illegal open carry violation... that's a class A misdemeanor in Wisconsin
Back to the original issue. I dont see how boycotting games that was sending the BLM message is now going to help support that message. True, lots of people decided not to watch but the ones that did got the message. Now no one gets the message and by in large no one cares.
So it's okay to shoot two people who chased you after you shot someone else?
Open carry laws are opposed by most cops, BTW. You have a situation where an individual openly carrying is cause to think he's about to commit a crime but what's he's doing is perfectly legal. Totally worthless laws, tbh.
As long as he leaves jail in a box
like i said, the absolute trash of humanity^
How is shooting a person in the head not murder? They were chasing him, sure, but as I said, couldn't the dead guys defense be that he also feared for his life and was trying to disarm him? what about the other men that were chasing him? They hear gunshots and see a chubby dude running down the street with a rifle, try to stop him, then get shot, couldn't they also have feared for their life?
yes, if you shot them in self defense.
duh
not okay to chase an armed guy with a skateboard apparently
The law works for everyone not just people who share your views.
He was absolutely an agitator but that doesn't give anyone the legal right to stomp him out. Its why cops protect KKK members during their rallies. And its not like most of the BLM martyrs over the years have been upstanding citizens. Most of them had lengthy criminal record and were in the middle of committing a crime. DId they deserve what they got? Should we say "well what did they think would happen"?
Maybe they don't want to dance for white people who don't give a that police keep murdering them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)