it appears so
Nathan89 better get in here and start throwing a temper tantrum about BigTech.
Did Twitter just tagged this loser's tweet with a "manipulated media" warning?
it appears so
Nathan89 better get in here and start throwing a temper tantrum about BigTech.
Reck This is why twitter tagged it as manipulated. They spliced "for police" into the question Barkan asked Biden to make it appear as if Biden wanted to take funding away from police.
In other words, they took advantage of the fact someone with ALS can only speak through an artificial voice assistance that's easily manipulated. Absolutely ing disgusting and shameful.
Nathan89 get in here and admit you're spreading fake news.
ing wow.
^^^
Damning ad, Will. Crying about whatever you think is not technically right is not going to get it done.
The images are powerful. People are going to reject violent Democrats.
not technically right. They manipulated someone's voice in order to misrepresent Biden saying he's in favor of defunding the police when he isn't. If the images themselves were powerful, they wouldn't need to ad their own fake news propaganda.
I agree the images are a powerful depiction of how much Trump has run this country into the ground.
Nathan is a liar. It's all part of his failed ideology.
I just proved you're a liar, derp
No surprise you want to push this lie too.
Biden has came out in favor of defunding police before trying to walk it back. You brought this s acking on yourself. Remember that.
Don't give stand down orders and let people riot if you don't like the ass kicking coming your way.
Why do you lie?
Show me where Biden came out in favor of defunding police. Chances are if he had the alt right wouldn't need to manipulate the voice of someone with ALS in order to make it seem like he had.
Do you condone the part of this video where they manipulate the voice assistance of someone with ALS?
Unreal.
The party of law and order making up their own truth to fit their narrative at the expense of a disabled person.
That is sick.
Also how many times does Biden the milquetoast moderate have to say he is not only for the police but also wants to fund them even more. He actually said that.
The sheepdogs will still eat it up that he’s against.
When the narrative first was popularized he supported it when asked about it. A day or two later, him and/or his handlers walked it back, calling it reallocating resources and whatever else.
Honestly, who cares what Biden says. He's a puppet who isn't going to make the decisions. If you want grubby handlers as your president, vote Biden. He's just a figurehead.
I'd have to see the evidence of manipulation; but I'm not bothered because that video delivered the kill shots long before that, anyways.
He really likes lying about the disabled or people he thinks are disabled. Gets his jollies.
Oh OK so you can't provide any proof that Biden supported defunding the police.
And you're OK with media manipulation in order to misle voters, or in other words ramping up the fascism.
Here is the proof that the video is manipulated. Actual conversation between Barkan and Biden:
Start at 2:55
Nathan saying that this video was "effective"
Can't? I watched report(s) on it in the wake of it. I don't go searching. If you don't accept that I saw it, that's fine. I don't lie about stuff like this; but you can believe whatever you want to believe.
As for the alleged manipulation, I think you just want an easy out rather than coming to terms with Democrats fostering and allowing these riots.
"I don't lie about stuff like this"
You're openly condoning an ad with spliced audio that lies about something Biden said.
He's not a serious user tbh.
Dude is a proven liar.
Why do you spread lies, Nathan?
Is it your failed ideology?
I've condoned nothing. The ad is effective in delivering the kill shot long before that bit at the end.
You can clutch your pearls rather than come to terms. I'm sure you will.
Butthurt derp
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)