Reply With Quote
He's probably more of a medical technician than Greta Thunberg is a environmental expert, tbh."medical assistance"
He's probably more of a medical technician than Greta Thunberg is a environmental expert, tbh.
umm
except…
after he shot people and they were bleeding and needing medical attention…
he rendered….ZERO ASSISTANCE
Honestly the adults who took him there, gave him a gun, and encouraged this behavior out of him should face more trouble than young Daniel Day-Lewis here. And obviously the morons attacking this kid are idiots who got what they deserved.
17 year old kids already have terrible judgement, it sucks when every single adult in the situation had worse judgement.
At least he didn’t yell for a medic.
Im just here to enjoy the show nigas
Keep punching each other out
He shot the graffiti off the wall? is that what the gun was for
Legally he's fine but he was 100% looking for this and he found it. the crybaby routine was hilarious in a dark humor way seen in that light
They showed a picture of him and others cleaning up the graffiti.
He should not have had a gun. The convicted felon that he shot, also should not have had one.
He was being attacked by a mob and he is a scared child, not combat trained special forces..
hahahahahahahahahaha!
Yeah, why didn't he just tell them to stop attacking him so he could render aid?
They were wise to correct that.
He comes from another state to quell the uncontrolled rioting he thinks the police cant handle. He brings a gun to the party... You bring a gun to the party you should know the consequences of that. Is this saying he had no idea his gun could actually kill people? this is a huge dumbass move, and the police that gave him water with the "thanks for the help", he or they need to face some consequences. We dont need armed citizens helping the police. The cop(s) was not shot and asking for his medical expertise.
I have seen zero on the trial, I just hope its fair. If the kid really did just get scared and really did not want to shoot anyone then let him get some manslaughter charge.
You sure your link didn't "correct" it?
Manslaughter for what?
I'm really trying to find out why people think that bringing a gun to Kenosha voids Kyle Rittenhouse's rights. How does it make sense logically or morally to claim that bringing a gun means that he can be attacked with impunity, and that if he defends himself, it's murder?
Don't forget sweet angel Kyle beats up on women too
And Joseph Rosenbaum raped little boys. Nobody is perfect.
what i find weird is that this is basically rittenhouse's justification for the attempt murder charge. he feared for his life because the guy with a gun approached him.
nah
any cop who shoots someone while defending himself-
IMMEDIATELY begins to render aid once the suspect/victim/perpetrator/whatever is on the ground dying
this lends credence to a person just defending themselves and after their successful defense
they understand that a human being is in distress and needs immediate medical attention
killers on the the other hand….
rittenhouse claims his MAIN reason for being there was to put out fires and render aid …
“approached him” lol
And why do you continue to leave out what happened to Rittenhouse immediately before he shot the guy who “approached him”.
No, Rittenhouse's justification is that the guy with the gun pointed it at him.
Bringing a gun to a protest =/= assault with a deadly weapon.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
