Well, if the attackers are black, it would get no burn on the MSM. It'd get swept under the rug like all the mass murders happening in the ghettos of Chicago on a near nightly basis.
I noticed CNN had a small side article about the missing black girl but no follow up since. Of course Fox won't even mention it. Meanwhile Pe o became a household name, poor little white girl dindunuffin.
Judge has a long history of asking murderers to stand behind him while he plays solitaire on his phone
JFC you can tell the prosecutor has never shot a rifle before. Oh yeah it's just like Call of Duty. I love turning on the aim assist when I'm trying to kill something with an AR-15.
Should have used the rubberized grip to reduce recoil and improve ADS speed.
This ur Twitter? Wondering you ever got back on after the bot like behavior warning they gave
you
Sorry, but they are the face of the 2A advocates, and also put their money where their mouth is (via litigation, for example). And the ACLU is certainly an advocacy group for civil rights, which is somewhat comparable, though nowhere near in size and funding. On the other hand Planned Parenthood is nothing like that, as they provide a plethora of other services and abortions are actually a small part of the services they provide.
Pretending the NRA isn't the staunchest defender and most visible face of the 2A advocates is simply being in denial, IMO. They've changed and become much more extremist in their stance over the years as well. This is a group that once upon a time worked with FDR to pass the first set of gun regulation in this country.
About the whole good guy with a gun, we do have stats showing Clinton's assault rifle ban was actually effective in curbing gun crimes involving assault weapons, and those actually declined. They were somewhat offset by gun crimes with other weapons using high capacity ammo, which is why that's also an area that's been looked at for regulation.
Well, IMO, you're an outlier. I know plenty of card carrying members, who are obviously gun owners as well, like to go to the range often, just happen to be staunch republicans as well, etc. Not bad people either, some of them are friends.
Nothing simplistic about it, and I don't watch the MSM, so I don't know what portrayal I'm missing here... I'm talking about people that are trained, gun safe at home, and kick the habit here and there. I get it, you're not one of those guys, that's fine.
Because they have the most influence when it comes to political/legal aspects of the 2A. They were, until very recently, the biggest lobby group in the entire United States. See: https://www.businessinsider.com/nra-...ontrol-2017-10
So when we talk about modest regulation of any kind of the 2A, that's essentially who you're going to run into and against.
Again, as I posted previously, there's advocacy to paint unfettered gun ownership as positive and desirable.
You can tell me I'm wrong, and that's a minority (and you could be correct), but it undeniably does exist, and that advocacy is, at the very least, misguided. That's what doesn't make the original statement a strawman.
Leaving completely to one side leaking putative jury deliberations to the press, isn't it a crime to have contact with a deliberating jury if you're not like, the bailiff or the judge or something?
BTW, are there any US Marshals attached to the court in Kenosha, or did they (supposedly) come from somewhere else?
Whether it was a protest or a riot doesn't really change the facts. The business owner should be the person protecting his business and property through lawful means. A 17-year-old kid from out of state should not be allowed to bring an AR-15 into a riot zone under the guise of protecting property he does not own. Let me be clear, I am completely in favor of prosecuting rioters who destroy property and break the law. However, I believe we allow our police force to be responsible for holding rioters accountable, not children playing at being a medic or cop. While his actions were likely lawful, I am in favor of changing the laws.
But yet the left wants to defund the police. No police + no vigilant justice = anarchy
Cori Bush is literally the only Democrat in congress who wants to defund the police. It’s not a remotely mainstream idea on “the left”
Good lord, the prosecution is shady af.
He was using lawful means when he asked civilians to protect his business using lawful means. The cops were not going to help.
Nobody's that stupid to die on that hill after what happened and is happening in Seattle. Defund the police $25 million and there are magical budget deficits and the city is a ing literal wasteland that is literally dying, but another one of those things swept under the rug.
Omar
AOC
Pressley
Talib
Cori Bush
etc
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinio...le-ncna1000946
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/...4-24-2012.html
https://www.chicagonow.com/politics-...-represent-me/
Especially this one
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...d-experiences/
Do you think hunters aren't pro 2A? They are. They just aren't militant about it and they often apply a modi of common sense. You can be an advocate without being a zealot.
...and some, i assume, are good people
When has AOC ever advocated for getting rid of police?
also you just named only 5 house reps. Specifically what you mean by “etc” or fold.
Cori Bush is stupid enough to defend it and does
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)