Reply With Quote
I'm not sure McConnell will see the threat of impeachments as a bad thing.
The right loves to project.
Everything is well Biden said this about the SCOTUS, RBG said this in 2016 etc etc.
Nevermind gots like Graham, Cotton and the turtle been on camera saying exactly the oposite of what they're about to do now.
I'm not sure McConnell will see the threat of impeachments as a bad thing.
Whatever the Democrats do, please don't take the bait and turn the confirmation hearings into a never ending discussion about Roe v. Wade and LGBT rights. McConnell and Trump would love nothing more than another 2004 election where social wedge issues overshadowed stagnant wages and growing wealth inequality. The Dems should be focused on campaign finance, labor, and election laws during confirmation hearings. We already know the nominee is going to be pro life.
good luck with that
Oh, the humanity!Repugs simply doing doing what the Capitalistic oligarchy pays them to do
Capitalists' $Bs are behind the corruption of the Repugs, and to similar extent the Dems.
And the corrupted, deeply partisan rightwingnutjob SCOTUS is also directly aiding the Capitalists' coup d'etat (bloodless so far)
the people that think for the standard idiot trumper only give them blurbs. There’s no thought out philosophy, only power. The entire philosophical foundation of the r’s, is standard scare tactics, and own the libs, and anti equality.
they’re not held to any standard of truth.
So they give their idiots talking points, and only talking points. That’s why they can’t actually tell you why they support trump. They don’t know themselves. They’ve been scared and brainwashed for decades that it’s not actually the people who have all the power responsible for their ty lives, it’s the people with no conceivable way to impose standards on them that are the real problem.
They depend on being thought for. They can’t do it themselves.
there was a time not too long ago where the pubs held all three federal branches of government, 34 governorships, with 31 of them controlling all three state branches. They were the government. But somehow they convinced the stupids that it was the Dems that were the reason they couldn’t do anything to benefit their citizens.
there is no amount of factual evidence you can show these idiots. You can just continue to root for covid and Darwin
Knock on wood but it's at least encouraging that Biden's campaign has indicated its going to use the SCOTUS seat to frame the issue around protecting healthcare. Stupid of me to not list that. The upcoming Obamacare ruling is what the Democrats should be grilling Trump's nominee on more than anything else, it's an issue that directly affects tens of millions of people.
As the old saying goes, there's three Gs that Democrats should avoid talking about during campaigns - guns, gays and god.
thanks for proving that you’re the dumbest of the dumb, and being a prime example of what I just posted. You’re a frightened little boy, scared of the world.
you serve no purpose
they will do anything and everything to deflect from their criminal mishandling of covid, and their even more criminal response.
this is all about not having to run on issues. The sad part is none of their idiots care at all about issues. This is about trying to scare the suburbs into not participating
Ankle biter's making cases
so why wouldn’t progressive’s want to protect choice, and people’s rights?
Cute. Going to your better than's to try to educate yourself.
It’s astonishing that someone can exist and be so oblivious to how worthless they truly are.
you’re angry little boy, knowing that this is all you have. And even the people that you side with think you’re too stupid to associate with, because you’re embarrassing
Do you not find worth in being Chump's butt licker nowadays?
How long did Obama take to nominate Garland after Scalia died? Like a month, right? I think it's just a matter of trying not to look too insensitive by doing it so quickly while RBG's body isn't even cold yet.
Trump has no tact, so I could see him making an announcement on twitter like 2 minutes after he found out that she passed
o strawman. Did I say they shouldn't want to protect choice and LGBT rights? No, of course not. I said those are the worst issues to emphasize when Democrats are trying to win elections.
SCOTUS ruled on gay marriage over 7 years ago, and even with another Trump appointee that ruling isn't going to be reversed. Outside of the really extreme ones like Tom Cotton, Republicans don't even talk about gay marriage anymore. The fact establishment Democrats still talk about it so much is because they want to avoid topics like wealth inequality that might piss off their corporate sponsors.
no seriously dude, you are the biggest loser on this site (and that’s almost impossible in a as world where Nathan and ducks exist).
i get that you’re a frightened little boy mad at the world for you ty lot in life. But you did it to yourself. So just appreciate my tax dollars supporting you because your moms too old, and you can’t fend for yourself, and shut the up
is cold. Had been for years. Nominate someone to do the job that goldbricker wouldn't do ASAP.How long did Obama take to nominate Garland after Scalia died? Like a month, right? I think it's just a matter of trying not to look too insensitive by doing it so quickly while RBG's body isn't even cold yet.
Trump has no tact, so I could see him making an announcement on twitter like 2 minutes after he found out that she passed
Yea, seriously. Do you not find worth in being Chump's butt licker nowadays?
Yes or no.
not really a straw man as the lgbtq community does make up a decent segment of the Dem party.
but you also skipped over woman’s rights issues, and, of course, civil rights. Why?
Yeah I don't think waiting another day is a good idea as they are going to come up with all sorts of wild sh1t to delay this. But that appears to be the strategy.
you never answered the question about the non republicans you’ve ever voted for.
Have you ever thought about what has made you so frightened and worthless?
Yes or no?
You went from Ducks/Nathan baggage to old questions baggage.
Gonna stick to new business.
Do you not find worth in being Chump's butt licker nowadays?
Yes or no.
Getting a confirmation vote done before election day is an omelette they won't be able to make without cracking a lot of eggsHow long did Obama take to nominate Garland after Scalia died? Like a month, right? I think it's just a matter of trying not to look too insensitive by doing it so quickly while RBG's body isn't even cold yet.
Trump has no tact, so I could see him making an announcement on twitter like 2 minutes after he found out that she passed
Democrats are always going to and whine about something. There's no use trying to kick back that tide.
Order is what voters want. Let the controlled media cry all they want.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
