Cuba libre! Anything Rum is good in my book tbh
Cuba libre! Anything Rum is good in my book tbh
The court needs 538 judges.
Sure, but we live in unusual times. Using Bush v Gore as a precedent doesn't get your attention?
so you’re ok with raping little children in trump concentration camps?
Unless somebody can point me to some fatal flaw on that decision, I don't see why would it be disqualifying...
What Amy Coney Barrett Means for the Future of Voting Rights
Unless we act, I fear a return to Jim Crow regime under which my grandparents and tens of millions of Black people suffered is inevitable.
Barrett’s record as a judge on the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit makes this clear.
In one decision, she supported “virtue-based restrictions” on voting.
In her view, voting is not a fundamental right guaranteed to every citizen of this country;
it is a privilege that states can revoke when they see fit.
Scalia notoriously denounced America’s civil rights legislation as a “perpetuation of racial en lement.”
Asked in her recent confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee whether she agreed with her former boss’ characterization of civil rights legislation, Barrett refused to say.
with Amy Coney Barrett in the fold, the conservative majority will succeed in dealing the Voting Right Act a final, fatal blow by making it effectively impossible for disempowered voters who challenge discriminatory rules to prevail in court.
https://www.thenation.com/article/so...ng-rights-act/
The scary truth is many Senate Democrats share Amy Coney Barrett's corporate agenda
What this tells us is that the corporate donors who control the Democratic Party are happy with a Justice Barrett.
In her short time on the bench, she has ruled consistently in favor of corporations.
Just weeks before her nomination to the high court,
Judge Barrett delivered a key ruling blocking many gig workers from suing in court when tech companies cheat them out of overtime pay.
This and other business-friendly rulings are why
corporations have given millions to groups such as the
Judicial Crisis Network and
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
to campaign for Barrett's appointment to the court.
Barrett also belongs to the business-backed Federalist Society and will join five other Federalists on the Supreme Court.
https://www.alternet.org/2020/10/amy...tt-2648539131/
70+ Climate Journalists Pen Open Letter Condemning Barrett for Enabling the 'Ecological Crisis of Our Times'
"At the moment when the facts of the case were presented to her, this arbiter of justice freely chose to side with mistruths. Judge Coney Barrett's responses are factually inaccurate, scientifically unsound, and dangerous."
the right-wing judge insisted she has "no firm views" on the climate crisis and,
in later written responses, called the science of climate change "controversial."
https://www.commondreams.org/news/20...logical-crisis
Judges Are Already Testing How Far Amy Coney Barrett Will Go for Republicans
In a shocking opinion, two judges tried to hijack Minnesota’s election law to throw out mail ballots.
Over the last week, four conservative justices on the Supreme Court have signaled their desire to throw out mail ballots that arrive after Election Day.
The court will remain deadlocked on this momentous issue—
which could affect the outcome of countless races—
until Amy Coney Barrett casts her first vote.
And the lower courts are taking bets on which side she’ll take.
It is the Barrett effect:
Lower court judges are beginning to test the limits of the Supreme Court,
trying to figure out how far right they can go without getting reversed.
It is an especially dangerous time for federal courts to
fabricate a new rule that prevents states from counting lawful ballots.
But with no clear check to rein in the judiciary’s accelerating radicalism,
some judges have decided it’s time to go all-in for Donald Trump and dare SCOTUS to stop them.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...e-ballots.html
In Harvard speech, Breyer speaks out against “court packing”
Breyer used a speech on Tuesday at Harvard Law School to argue against efforts to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court.
“the court is guided by legal principle, not politics” and would therefore be eroded if the court’s structure were changed in response to concerns about the influence of politics on the Supreme Court.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/in-harvard-speech-breyer-speaks-out-against-court-packing
Repugs blocked Garland
Repug blocked vetting of Kavanaugh
That's not "court packing" for Breyer?
He must assume his Harvard audience is ing stupid and ignorant.
"party of the working class" ting on the working class per par (and in favor of ACB who cucked Trump )
ACB is not a working class hero story. She's a piece of ass who was chosen to be a puppet is all.
Is this like when you guys were all for Mueller when he said Trump didn't collude, but then flipped on him cuz he didn't jail Shillary or something re ed like that?
Your own meme referred to her bartending gig. If that ain’t working class i don’t know what is
I didn't say she wasn't working class, philo.
And the meme is ting on AOC for being working class
Handmaid Barrett to Derp and all the other dip anti-vaxxers:
dumb as a rock or she thinks you are
wHy wOuLd AnYonE tHiNk wE'Re pArTisaN hAckS?
You're still pissed because we did wet work on the Garland affair.
tee, hee.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)