Reply With Quote
Trump isn’t doing anything outside the rules of the cons ution and Biden wouldn’t be either if he packed the court. You’re simply deciding what’s “wrong” based off whether it helps your political party.
It’s really not. Whether or not Trump is actually saying we don’t deserve to know he clearly thinks we do since he’s been deliberately vague.
Trump isn’t doing anything outside the rules of the cons ution and Biden wouldn’t be either if he packed the court. You’re simply deciding what’s “wrong” based off whether it helps your political party.
There's always El Pollo Tropical to sit down and think about det one
I heard El Pollo Tropical’s sales are down this month so Trump might be in trouble.
Dr Darrin: Sales are up in da zip code, they just added zinc to the seasoning...
Yes it's worse than the president not saying there will be a peaceful transition of power if he loses
, rmt's not going to vote for Biden now
I have already posted that I don't think Biden believes in packing the court or getting rid of the filibuster - see my answer to Dirk's Finale.
It's Biden's own exact words - of course, the media is not going to emphasize or harp on these words.
Or it's worse than killing 250K Americans... let's overlook that.Yes it's worse than the president not saying there will be a peaceful transition of power if he loses
Sigh, you can always tell there's nothing else to say when conversation devolves to Pollo Tropical digs (which I'm having for dinner right now).
Yep, Trump killed 250k Americans.
Under his watch... sorry you're a fan.
off, Wild Cobra
Like Trump would never think of doing it if needed.
I hope Joe does not play his game.
But if he does, I understand.
You slap, I punch. Could even get worse with a president this bad.
It does not get old and still trump still continues lying.
.
Less is definitely more for you.
maybe Biden will pack the court
Gee. Wonder what the conclusion will be.
No telling. Having one judge for each circuit would be analogous to how the number we have now was determined, before that it varied. Going by that scheme twelve could be the new number.
https://www.history.com/news/supreme...r-cons ution
The smart money is betting on "needing" 4 more Supremes.
playing fair/bipartisan or whatever flew out the window after the incompatible ways Garland and ACB were treated
Biden most likely cant tell a judge from a wall painting at this point. But his handlers, im sure have a plan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
