Reply With Quote
Who would have thought? Drunk customers and covid safety do not mix well.
Bars and Covid-19 safety rules don't mix, study found.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/15/healt...ess/index.html
Who would have thought? Drunk customers and covid safety do not mix well.
Bars and Covid-19 safety rules don't mix, study found.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/15/healt...ess/index.html
BUT PEOPLE ARE GETTING SNIFFLES!
GTFO with your beta . This America, shut-in.
but my covid relief check
MJ
A classic case of liberal priorities…
California recently updated its coronavirus vaccine guidelines, placing medical marijuana workers higher up in priority than some teachers, bus drivers and food and agricultural workers.
As reported by the Orange County Register, the decision drew backlash from educators, but celebration from those in the medical marijuana industry.
“Cannabis delivery drivers before school bus drivers and teachers? Makes no sense to me,” Los Angeles Unified School District Superintendent Austin Beutner tweeted.
San Francisco police district reports 340% e in burglaries
Anybody taking bets on his recall odds?
The same state that rejected .06 of ballots based on signatures is rejecting half of recall signatues.
Commies really getting desperate.
https://beckernews.com/newsoms-calif...lection-36901/
I thought you were a fan of strict signature matching...
Is that what you think this is? You think that the recall effort is fraudulent?
???? Said nothing like that.
If half the signatures are being rejected, that's the implication.
This isn't hard stuff.
Like I said, I thought you were a fan of strict signature matching? now that its invalidating votes you care for, they're not that important anymore?
I'm not a fan of disenfranchisement like you are.
There's a reason Newsom's people aren't sounding any alarms on this.
I was never a fan of strict signature matching, so, unlike you, that pick and choose when disenfranchisement is ok, I've been always against it.
I'm just pointing out that you were whining about the lack of signature matching in Georgia and Arizona a mere couple of months ago, but now signature matching bad apparently.
You're trying to act like fifty percent rejection rates is what signature verification is about. It's not. Get your together.
Yes, they ignored the process in place to protect against fraud.
You pretending this is the same thing is straight-up sperm shielding on your part.
This isn't an election with official ballots, addresses and tracking numbers, this is a sheet of paper with signatures. One would expect the rejection rate to be higher.
50% certainly sounds a bit high up there, but what the rate is has no bearing in signature verification being good or bad. You either are for it or you're not.
Of course it's the same thing. And there was nothing ignored in Georgia or Arizona. Whenever this was brought up in court, it was shot down due the lack of evidence of any wrongdoing.
This isn't a matter of opinion, simply facts.
Lol crying about Gavin Newsom because Trump lost and you still can't come to terms
Lots of things to criticize Newsom about, especially bending the knee on COVID lockdowns. This isn't a defense of his. Just pointing out the hypocrisy of liking signature matching only when it's convenient.
Troglodyte reasoning.
You're so full of , you should be slapped. Being for signature verification doesn't mean being for the shameless misuse thereof.
Your gotry is on full display.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
