I didn't wear one for a week or so in the summer. But cases got high and they pretty much mandated them. I complied, and I continue to comply.
I didn't wear one for a week or so in the summer. But cases got high and they pretty much mandated them. I complied, and I continue to comply.
nope
If you had population information you wouldn't be doing analysis. Sample is not analysis you use if for analysis because you don't know the population, the distribution was given by my sentence.
my numbers are based off a linear model yhat=12/545x1+2600/109 + e where deaths depend on cases all other factors ignored and of course epsilon is zero. You can argue that the model is incorrect because I have ignored the other factors but the math is not incorrect. I'm not out here to argue that the model is wrong, it's based off one prior. But math is math, and statistics is statistics. Statistics uses math but that doesn't mean when you are incorrect stat wise you are incorrect math wise. Your model can be incorrect but the math you used to get it is not.
I didn't notice the "whiteys" reference before. What does that have to do with anything?
This is all kinds of wrong explained by the definition of applied stats comparing population means, variances, etc. Keep going with the gossip
I didn't say you did
What does you being in a heavy republican area have to do with anything? Your area is only wearing a mask because you have to.
You're a ing idiot
also when you compare population means it's based off an interval, based off a sample. That doesnt mean you know the population mean
Beaahajahajaaahahhszuzuzuuauayayzyzuauzuzyzyzysyay agagahahahaysgs
You said "if you had population information you wouldn't be doing analysis"
Stop posting. Your math is terrible
if you had population statistics you wouldn't be doing any inference
Literally this guy said the above. Straight WrongdomGuy math.
Lololoooooooolokloooolloollloolll
Now I understand why you think masks work.
Advice. Take a stats class.
If you have population statistics you don't have to estimate the parameters ergo no inference. However you never have population statistics, so you have to use inference. But you'd know that if you weren't getting your info and math words from facebook and ty youtubes
Loloooolloooloollollllollllllllllllll
Step away from the keyboard. You continue to be wrong with each post.
no i'm not
Same with AIDS... not sure how that's a little known fact.
Will beat me to it. Looks like it was a known fact.
We were talking the cytokine storm from SARS-COV-2 back in January. LOL Karrin.
Thanks for sharing, but that paper is far from conclusive (nor it makes the assertion) that there's "30%-50% pre-existing immunity".
Any other of the "numerous studies" verified that claim?
foldren folds
another fold, you hate to see it
Back on topic of this thread....this picture sums up why I’m fairly confident that Trump is in deep
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)