Page 12 of 34 FirstFirst ... 2891011121314151622 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 843
  1. #276
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    How about the pushback when you said you didn't wear masks in convenience stores?
    Cry

  2. #277
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    How about the pushback when you said you didn't wear masks in convenience stores?
    I didn't wear one for a week or so in the summer. But cases got high and they pretty much mandated them. I complied, and I continue to comply.

  3. #278
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,646
    Sure.
    1. He's assuming everyone is susceptible
    2. He's assuming cdc accuracies in case counts.
    3. Hes assuming simply multiplying by 2 will give him the amount ef deaths essentially, without any type of statistical analysis i.e. distribution, population, sample, variance, etc..
    nope

    If you had population information you wouldn't be doing analysis. Sample is not analysis you use if for analysis because you don't know the population, the distribution was given by my sentence.

    my numbers are based off a linear model yhat=12/545x1+2600/109 + e where deaths depend on cases all other factors ignored and of course epsilon is zero. You can argue that the model is incorrect because I have ignored the other factors but the math is not incorrect. I'm not out here to argue that the model is wrong, it's based off one prior. But math is math, and statistics is statistics. Statistics uses math but that doesn't mean when you are incorrect stat wise you are incorrect math wise. Your model can be incorrect but the math you used to get it is not.

  4. #279
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    Yeah like BB said, only because you have to be. Otherwise all the whiteys in your gated community would be singing their maskless hearts out at Cornerstone.


    I didn't notice the "whiteys" reference before. What does that have to do with anything?

  5. #280
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    nope

    If you had population information you wouldn't be doing analysis. Sample is not analysis you use if for analysis because you don't know the population, the distribution was given by my sentence.

    my numbers are based off a linear model yhat=12/545x1+2600/109 + e where deaths depend on cases all other factors ignored and of course epsilon is zero. You can argue that the model is incorrect because I have ignored the other factors but the math is not incorrect. I'm not out here to argue that the model is wrong, it's based off one prior. But math is math, and statistics is statistics. Statistics uses math but that doesn't mean when you are incorrect stat wise you are incorrect math wise. Your model can be incorrect but the math you used to get it is not.

  6. #281
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    nope

    If you had population information you wouldn't be doing analysis. Sample is not analysis you use if for analysis because you don't know the population, the distribution was given by my sentence.

    my numbers are based off a linear model yhat=12/545x1+2600/109 + e where deaths depend on cases all other factors ignored and of course epsilon is zero. You can argue that the model is incorrect because I have ignored the other factors but the math is not incorrect. I'm not out here to argue that the model is wrong, it's based off one prior. But math is math, and statistics is statistics. Statistics uses math but that doesn't mean when you are incorrect stat wise you are incorrect math wise. Your model can be incorrect but the math you used to get it is not.
    This is all kinds of wrong explained by the definition of applied stats comparing population means, variances, etc. Keep going with the gossip

  7. #282
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,236
    I don't go to church.
    I didn't say you did

  8. #283
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    76,236


    I didn't notice the "whiteys" reference before. What does that have to do with anything?
    What does you being in a heavy republican area have to do with anything? Your area is only wearing a mask because you have to.

  9. #284
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,646
    This is all kinds of wrong explained by the definition of applied stats comparing population means, variances, etc. Keep going with the gossip
    You're a ing idiot

  10. #285
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,646
    This is all kinds of wrong explained by the definition of applied stats comparing population means, variances, etc. Keep going with the gossip
    also when you compare population means it's based off an interval, based off a sample. That doesnt mean you know the population mean

  11. #286
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    also when you compare population means it's based off an interval, based off a sample. That doesnt mean you know the population mean
    Beaahajahajaaahahhszuzuzuuauayayzyzuauzuzyzyzysyay agagahahahaysgs
    You said "if you had population information you wouldn't be doing analysis"


    Stop posting. Your math is terrible

  12. #287
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,646
    Beaahajahajaaahahhszuzuzuuauayayzyzuauzuzyzyzysyay agagahahahaysgs
    You said "if you had population information you wouldn't be doing analysis"


    Stop posting. Your math is terrible
    if you had population statistics you wouldn't be doing any inference

  13. #288
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    also when you compare population means it's based off an interval, based off a sample. That doesnt mean you know the population mean
    Literally this guy said the above. Straight WrongdomGuy math.

  14. #289
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    if you had population statistics you wouldn't be doing any inference
    Lololoooooooolokloooolloollloolll


    Now I understand why you think masks work.


    Advice. Take a stats class.

  15. #290
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,646
    Lololoooooooolokloooolloollloolll


    Now I understand why you think masks work.


    Advice. Take a stats class.
    If you have population statistics you don't have to estimate the parameters ergo no inference. However you never have population statistics, so you have to use inference. But you'd know that if you weren't getting your info and math words from facebook and ty youtubes

  16. #291
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    If you have population statistics you don't have to estimate the parameters ergo no inference. However you never have population statistics, so you have to use inference. But you'd know that if you weren't getting your info and math words from facebook and ty youtubes
    Loloooolloooloollollllollllllllllllll


    Step away from the keyboard. You continue to be wrong with each post.

  17. #292
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,646
    Loloooolloooloollollllollllllllllllll


    Step away from the keyboard. You continue to be wrong with each post.
    no i'm not

  18. #293
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    Little known fact. This virus doesn't kill you. Your own immune system kills you. Especially among the fat and old.
    Same with AIDS... not sure how that's a little known fact.

  19. #294
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    Will beat me to it. Looks like it was a known fact.

  20. #295
    Take the fcking keys away baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    93,160
    Will beat me to it. Looks like it was a known fact.
    We were talking the cytokine storm from SARS-COV-2 back in January. LOL Karrin.

  21. #296
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    Thanks for sharing, but that paper is far from conclusive (nor it makes the assertion) that there's "30%-50% pre-existing immunity".

    Any other of the "numerous studies" verified that claim?

  22. #297
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    Llloooolollollolll of covid is anywhere on the cert its a cov9d death. Just like I stated above.
    foldren folds

  23. #298
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    Loloooolloooloollollllollllllllllllll

    Step away from the keyboard. You continue to be wrong with each post.
    another fold, you hate to see it

  24. #299
    4-25-20 Will Hunting's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    22,310
    Back on topic of this thread....this picture sums up why I’m fairly confident that Trump is in deep


  25. #300
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    21,198
    Back on topic of this thread....this picture sums up why I’m fairly confident that Trump is in deep


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •