You can lead a horse to water...
directly from the report.
they identified contacts, not coordination. i'm well aware that collusion is a colloquial and not a legal term, but even that by definition requires some degree of coordination or cooperation. you have to let this one go, brah
are you taking in to consideration the refusal to comply with subpoenas from the trump crew? Or the instances of outright lies they told to investigators cited in the report?
i think there was a legitimate case for obstruction of justice and the dems in congress pussied out
Forgive the formatting from transfer of a PDF. Let me know which one's you want to dive in to
SUMMARY
1.Joe Biden’scompromising partnershipwith the Communist Party of Chinaruns viaYang Jiechi(CPC’s Central Foreign Affairs Commission).YANG metfrequentlywith BIDENduring his tenure at the Chinese embassy in Washington.
2.Hunter Biden’s2013 Bohai Harvest Rosemont investment partnership was set-up by Ministry of Foreign Affairs ins utionsdesigned to garner influence with foreign leaders during YANG’s tenure as Foreign Minister.
3.HUNTER has a direct line to the Politburo, according to SOURCE A, a senior finance professional in China.
4.Michael Lin brokered the BHRpartnershipand partners with MOFAforeign influence organizations.
5.LIN is a POI for his work on behalf of China, as confirmed by SOURCE B and SOURCEC(at two separate national intelligence agencies).
6.BHR is a state managed operation. Leading shareholder in BHRis a Bank of China and BHR’s partnersare SOEsthatfunnel revenue/assets to BHR.
7.HUNTERcontinues to hold 10%in BHR. He visited China in 2010 and met with major Chinese government financial companies that would later back BHR.
8.HUNTER’s BHR stake (purchasedfor $400,000)is now likely be worth approx. $50 million(fees and capital appreciation based onBHR’s $6.5 billion AUM).
9.HUNTER also did business with Chinese tycoons linked with the Chinese militaryand against the interests of US national security.
10.BIDEN’s foreign policy stance towards China(formerly hawkish), has since turned positive despite China’scountry’s rising geopolitical assertiveness.
Steele's main source was a Russian agent and Russia knew he was compiling a dossier. Any more stupid questions?
You're sorry that you think it more logical to give a fake affidavit to an incredibly biased "news" outlet rather than posting the email (that the guy claims to have) online? What are you saying here - use your words not your memes.
he can’t
Trump is really trying to replicate all of 2016 key moments.
He thinks bringing out this guy who Biden himself probably doesn't even know will have the same effect as Bill's s?
https://typhooninvestigations.wordpress.com/
Seems like a legit outfit
Thank you. Nothing to dive into, really, looks like another nothingburger, provided it's true at all.
Biden most definitely knows him.
premiere intelligence firm can't even host it's own website... sounds completely legit
again, "did not establish" is not the same as "no evidence".
He admitted he couldn't get sufficient evidence to establish, and where he didn't have any evidence he said that explicitly.
Manafort gave a Russian asset internal polling/voter data in the middle of Russian efforts to interfere in the election. Sorry man, that seems pretty clear to me. Mueller couldn't get Kilimnik on the stand, so proving what happened to that data is not something we are ever really going to get a handle on.
Serious question:
What do you think Russian intelligence would have done with detailed voter information of the kind that campaigns compile in 2016?
------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by RandomGuy; 10-22-2020 at 03:21 PM.
Eyup. MY thoughts exactly.
Skeezy Bannon operation MO all over the place.
He's already handing over do ents to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. I have no reason to believe he is also forging do ents at the same time.
Typhoon Investigations
Need Protection Against the World’s No.1 Attack Vector?
For complex and sensitive investigations concerning Greater China, we provide the following:
Corporate investigations into IP theft, fraud, and corruption
Employee background screening for hidden political/military ties
Political risk management on complex Chinese targets
Military risk and vulnerability assessments
Regional security intelligence and analysis
Based in Switzerland and with specialists across the world, we enable informed decision-making in complex political, commercial and regulatory conditions.
We value privacy – no records are kept – giving decision makers peace of mind when embracing the opportunities facing their organization.
George folds.
Don't forget you guys told us Joe was forgetful and pretty much a zombie up to about a week ago, tbh...
He might not very well remember this person at all...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)