oh look another thread telling us all about what Nathan read about "the left". DUN DUN DUN!!
The cultural power of the corrupt modern left is too significant. It's unfortunate most of America isn't aware of what they are up against.
oh look another thread telling us all about what Nathan read about "the left". DUN DUN DUN!!
Yes, another thread pointing out reality.
another thread reading you whining like a ty-baby about how persecuted you are.
cry harder.
ACB is a hired shill for the billionaires who financed her, along with Gorsuch and Kavanaugh
, that is about what *I* expect from the right.
About the time you set aside any annoyance, and try to have an honest, good faith discussion, they on that, and go back to blathering about some bit or other they saw on twitter.
Any time you get challenged in your bull threads by a rational thought, or honest skepticism, you cry conspiracy.
It's predictable.
How do consider this a legitimate response to evidence of changing dictionary definitions and videos of Democrat senator using that nonsense to smear ACB?
Stupid, yes.
Corrupt? Trump
hurts us alot more than them, this gonna the country for the next 30+ years
That hurts them plenty too, they’re just too re ed to see it because votingrepublican.jpg
Worth it for them to own the gays by ing up their marriage though
Roe v Wade might be ed, but I don’t see them reversing on gay marriage even with COVID Barrett. The religious right has largely given up on the gay marriage issue, Roberts/Kavanaugh/Gorsuch aren’t going to reverse that. Those three are all about ruling in favor of liberals on wedge issues so they can build credibility as impartial judges for when they issue rulings that poor people over.
I just can't see roe v wade getting overturned because then they're out of dog whistles for the evangelicals and catholic mexicans.
Yeah if I had to bet on it I’d say your right, but Thomas/Alito/Barrett don’t just stop at using it as a dog whistle, they genuinely believe the life at conception bull . That’s 3 guaranteed votes to overturn Roe. Imo Roberts is going to do what he did with voting rights, slowly chip away at it over the next 1-2 years until he finally goes for the kill.
It's all good no matter how you look at it, IMO. If Roe goes down and Biden doesn't pack the court, then the Democrats will need to implode, which is not a terrible thing longer term.
The GOP is extremely unpopular as it is. Them keep on playing stupid games, means they'll end up with stupid prizes.
They had to take out the alternative spelling of potato cos Dan Quayle triggered them so badly.
It's going to get overturned, and the DNC is going to lose all its money from Planned Parenthood baby murder factories.
Sorry this is happening to you
Libertarians, and right-wingers do not want honest, good faith discussions about topics. They want to tell you what to think, and almost never, ever, examine their underlying assumptions.
Someone told you what to think, then you decided you had an original thought and forgot the fact you were told what to think, then you came in here and post something to pump up your epeen factor.
You are actively lying when you imply here that you want a "legitimate response". You do not give a squirt of about a legitimate response, because your only real concern is to pump up your ego by thinking you are "owning the libs".
You lie to me, and, more importantly, you lie to yourself about that.
No putting the genie back in the bottle on abortion. There is an easy, cheap pill that will do that in a few minutes, without side effects.
Make it illegal in a state, and an underground network will spring up to provide that pill, while women in that state mobilize votes.
Conservatives oppose it until they have to force their teenage daughter to be pregnant for months. Then they look the other way.
Never underestimate the power of conservative hypocrisy.
All of that said, I will give you a chance to get a legitimate response, and prove you are telling the truth, all you have to do is simply have a good faith, honest discussion.
Good-faith, honest discussions require direct answers to questions, and the ability to acknowledge when you may not have a strong case or point.
Good-faith, honest discussions require that you may occasionally have to even acknowledge that other people made good points.
Do you want a good-faith, honest discussion, or do you want to tell me some more about what you have been deluded into believing about what I think?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)