Biden will be president.
Trump lost.
Biden will be president.
Trump lost.
i'm not "raging" in the least. i'm seriously trying to understand how correcting someone who thinks they know it all is condescending. after the fact, with subsequent replies maybe, but my initial reply was informative. as well, would you give in to demands to hold someone's hand and educate them after they just tried to put you down because their ego is too big to accept they're a low information leech? to each their own i suppose...
last, what exactly am i bitter about? bitter that i have more of a grasp on the process vs. someone like reck who just claims what they're spoonfed from the MSM?
Imo it sometimes makes sense in a vanilla civil suit where you’re only seeking money to get a bare bones complaint filed just to start the clock and create work for the other side in answering, but yeah, there’s no rational justification for slow rolling evidence if you’re trying to get an injunction or some other emergency relief.
Perkins Coie has already successfully pled a laches defense to election claims that Trump/the GOP sat on, courts don’t like it when parties sit on claims and evidence so they can “ambush” the other side
There it is at the end “low information leech”. The tones of hate came out earlier. But you capped it in the end. Again it is what it is, but if you really are trying to change just using nicer words isn’t it. You really have to change your mindset. But after a certain age most people are who they are, change is hard
lol calling someone a low information leech is now hate? does he or does he not latch on to low info/misinfo? a leech does what exactly? whatever.
Bread lines, mass unemployment, rampant disinformation and open authoritarianism.
Is this capitalism?
Put up in court or shut up, Rudy.
Drip. Drip. Drip.
Michigan Poll Observer: Military Ballots Looked Like ‘Xerox Copies,’ All for Biden
https://www.theepochtimes.com/michigan-poll-observer-military-ballots-looked-like-xerox-copies-all-for-biden_3600974.html
Why meet Rudy? He's only going to drip oil and touch himself.
Trump lost and will forever be a loser.
sure but thats usually a cost-cutting decision, not a strategic one in an attempt to win on the merits
Agreed, if cost is not a factor then you file a robust complaint with exhibits and detailed facts. When I sued someone earlier this year I intentionally included hundreds of pages of exhibits (many of which I didn’t really need) just for the sake of intimidating the defendant and forcing a settlement.
People think scenes from movies where one side presents bombs evidence the other side had never seen before is actually how it works
Lol I use it all the time but mostly to be ridiculous and silly
They didn’t ask for discovery?
There's no serious intention to contest the election anymore, that ship has sailed, especially in light of the fact that there's no credible evidence of widespread fraud. If you look at the recent (serious) filings, the dispute now centers on technicalities such as Act 77 in PA.
What's disheartening at this stage is the fact that it's seemingly incredibly easy to take advantage of stupid people out there for political money, tbh. This is another byproduct of Citizen's United and SuperPACs, which I don't think was thought of at the time it was decided.
Describe Trump's many paths to victory, derp.
what's funny? Even Rudy is on the court record claiming there was no fraud.
Derp folds with typical gibberish tweets and youtubes, par, smh.
Never got that far (I also hit them with a lot of disco requests at the same time I filed the lawsuit, so it was either settle or get to work responding to my discovery and filing an answer).
This particular thing seems less like a Citizens United issue and more like a votingrepublican.jpg issue.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)