Official Stealing The 2020 Election For Harris/Biden Watch Thread

[spurraider21]

It's a myth that they were "all for Biden".

Wisconsin has a law that mail-in ballots can't be processed and tallied until election day, which was never an issue since prior to this election since there was a minimal amount of mail-in votes in Wisconsin before COVID (note that Democrats in Michigan wanted to change this law this year to avoid the scenario where ballot counting would last for days and raise doubt about the election, but the Republican-controlled state houses in Wisconsin voted it down).

Additionally, Trump encouraged his supporters to avoid voting by mail because it was "fraudulent" while Biden encouraged his supporters to vote by mail for public safety reasons, thus you had this lopsided effect where in-person votes skewed Trump and mail-in votes skewed towards Biden. In a state like Wisconsin where mail-in votes don't get processed until election day, Trump was always going to jump out to a huge lead. The jump you're seeing on that stupid chart is when a bunch of mail-in votes from Milwaukee County (i.e., black people in Milwaukee) were counted, and those naturally skewed heavily towards Biden. They were mail-in votes from Dem-heavy areas.

Compare this to Ohio, where mail-in ballots get processed BEFORE in-person votes did. On election night Biden jumped out to a huge lead on Trump because mail-in votes favored him, but as in-person votes were counted and as mail-in votes had already been counted Trump ultimately won out. That wasn't su ious at all and neither was Wisconsin. Each state has its own laws/process for counting votes, and the common theme is that in-person votes went for Trump and mail-in votes went for Biden.

and precincts in milwakuee cant individually report their results. milwaukee has a central counting location that tallies up the various precincts and announces their results in larger chunks than usual, per the article i posted just above

[Mark Celibate]

It's a myth that they were "all for Biden".

Wisconsin has a law that mail-in ballots can't be processed and tallied until election day, which was never an issue since prior to this election since there was a minimal amount of mail-in votes in Wisconsin before COVID (note that Democrats in Michigan wanted to change this law this year to avoid the scenario where ballot counting would last for days and raise doubt about the election, but the Republican-controlled state houses in Wisconsin voted it down).

Additionally, Trump encouraged his supporters to avoid voting by mail because it was "fraudulent" while Biden encouraged his supporters to vote by mail for public safety reasons, thus you had this lopsided effect where in-person votes skewed Trump and mail-in votes skewed towards Biden. In a state like Wisconsin where mail-in votes don't get processed until election day, Trump was always going to jump out to a huge lead. The jump you're seeing on that stupid chart is when a bunch of mail-in votes from Milwaukee County (i.e., black people in Milwaukee) were counted, and those naturally skewed heavily towards Biden. They were mail-in votes from Dem-heavy areas.

Compare this to Ohio, where mail-in ballots get processed BEFORE in-person votes did. On election night Biden jumped out to a huge lead on Trump because mail-in votes favored him, but as in-person votes were counted and as mail-in votes had already been counted Trump ultimately won out. That wasn't su ious at all and neither was Wisconsin. Each state has its own laws/process for counting votes, and the common theme is that in-person votes went for Trump and mail-in votes went for Biden.

Yep, I think it was Jamstone that posted how this was almost by design in Michigan where Republicans control the state legislature. Democrats proposed a bill to state Congress in order to start counting mail-in ballots early before Election Day. They shot it down, essentially because Trump knew that he would build a lead before these were counted since Republicans obviously were voting more in person. So in states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin he could discredit and challenge it once his lead "vanished" after the mail-in ballots were counted afterwards. Intentionally causing a sh!tstorm since he knew he could rile up his supporters by claiming "conspiracy". To me, the jump in votes makes sense. I was just curious about the "zero votes for Trump" thing that I keep seeing getting circulated and if it was true or just BS. We all know random charts from Google images never lie tbh imho

[spurraider21]

Yep, I think it was Jamstone that posted how this was almost by design in Michigan where Republicans control the state legislature. Democrats proposed a bill to state Congress in order to start counting mail-in ballots early before Election Day. They shot it down, essentially because Trump knew that he would build a lead before these were counted since Republicans obviously were voting more in person. So in states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin he could discredit and challenge it once his lead "vanished" after the mail-in ballots were counted afterwards. Intentionally causing a sh!tstorm since he knew he could rile up his supporters by claiming "conspiracy". To me, the jump in votes makes sense. I was just curious about the "zero votes for Trump" thing that I keep seeing getting circulated and if it was true or just BS. We all know random charts from Google images never lie tbh imho

even the random chart is ambiguous. you cant really see what happens to the red line behind the blue

[FrostKing]

Pretty sure everybody knows he's getting those.

Yes but they deliberately froze him at 214 for optics. Now when he gets those all of a sudden, it will enflame belief/support that the election is indeed not yet over

[FrostKing]

Been on this forum 10 years. My first ignore.

[Will Hunting]

Yes but they deliberately froze him at 214 for optics. Now when he gets those all of a sudden, it will enflame belief/support that the election is indeed not yet over

It really won’t.

[Spurtacular]

It's a myth that they were "all for Biden".

Wisconsin has a law that mail-in ballots can't be processed and tallied until election day, which was never an issue since prior to this election since there was a minimal amount of mail-in votes in Wisconsin before COVID (note that Democrats in Michigan wanted to change this law this year to avoid the scenario where ballot counting would last for days and raise doubt about the election, but the Republican-controlled state houses in Wisconsin voted it down).

Additionally, Trump encouraged his supporters to avoid voting by mail because it was "fraudulent" while Biden encouraged his supporters to vote by mail for public safety reasons, thus you had this lopsided effect where in-person votes skewed Trump and mail-in votes skewed towards Biden. In a state like Wisconsin where mail-in votes don't get processed until election day, Trump was always going to jump out to a huge lead. The jump you're seeing on that stupid chart is when a bunch of mail-in votes from Milwaukee County (i.e., black people in Milwaukee) were counted, and those naturally skewed heavily towards Biden. They were mail-in votes from Dem-heavy areas.

Compare this to Ohio, where mail-in ballots get processed BEFORE in-person votes did. On election night Biden jumped out to a huge lead on Trump because mail-in votes favored him, but as in-person votes were counted and as mail-in votes had already been counted Trump ultimately won out. That wasn't su ious at all and neither was Wisconsin. Each state has its own laws/process for counting votes, and the common theme is that in-person votes went for Trump and mail-in votes went for Biden.

This claim about election victory is disputed

Learn how voting by mail is fraudulent and insecure

That's not an explanation of the 100K plus dumps in Michigan in Wisconsin. That's your preset excuse for the cheating on how the reversal was going to occur.

[Spurtacular]

even the random chart is ambiguous. you cant really see what happens to the red line behind the blue

Learn how voting by mail is fraudulent and insecure

[Spurtacular]

and precincts in milwakuee cant individually report their results. milwaukee has a central counting location that tallies up the various precincts and announces their results in larger chunks than usual, per the article i posted just above
Learn how voting by mail is fraudulent and insecure

[ElNono]

Yes but they deliberately froze him at 214 for optics. Now when he gets those all of a sudden, it will enflame belief/support that the election is indeed not yet over

not really, it's 3 electoral votes

[Will Hunting]

That's not an explanation of the 100K plus dumps in Michigan in Wisconsin. That's your preset excuse for the cheating on how the reversal was going to occur.

It’s my “preset excuse” because it has the benefit of being true. If anything I said was false feel free to point out what specifically in my post wasn’t true.

[Will Hunting]

That's not an explanation of the 100K plus dumps in Michigan in Wisconsin. That's your preset excuse for the cheating on how the reversal was going to occur.

It’s my “preset excuse” because it has the benefit of being true. If anything I said was false feel free to point out what specifically in my post wasn’t true.

[ElNono]

That's not an explanation of the 100K plus dumps in Michigan in Wisconsin. That's your preset excuse for the cheating on how the reversal was going to occur.

sorry this is happening to you. Have more copium.

[Spurtacular]

Yep, I think it was Jamstone that posted how this was almost by design in Michigan where Republicans control the state legislature. Democrats proposed a bill to state Congress in order to start counting mail-in ballots early before Election Day. They shot it down, essentially because Trump knew that he would build a lead before these were counted since Republicans obviously were voting more in person. So in states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin he could discredit and challenge it once his lead "vanished" after the mail-in ballots were counted afterwards. Intentionally causing a sh!tstorm since he knew he could rile up his supporters by claiming "conspiracy". To me, the jump in votes makes sense. I was just curious about the "zero votes for Trump" thing that I keep seeing getting circulated and if it was true or just BS. We all know random charts from Google images never lie tbh imho

This claim about election victory is disputed
Learn how voting by mail is fraudulent and insecure

Intentionally causing a storm? Republicans weren't the ones kicking out poll watchers and then doing voter dumps with nobody around at 4 in the morning. That's third world , dude.

[Spurtacular]

It’s my “preset excuse” because it has the benefit of being true. If anything I said was false feel free to point out what specifically in my post wasn’t true.

You're okay with the cheating. It is what it is.

[ChumpDumper]

Intentionally causing a storm? Republicans weren't the ones kicking out poll watchers and then doing voter dumps with nobody around at 4 in the morning. That's third world , dude.

There was never "nobody around." Watchers from both parties were always there.

Nothing you say is true. You've created this elaborate fantasy world because you can't stand the fact you lost.

[Spurtacular]

There was never "nobody around." Watchers from both parties were always there.

Nothing you say is true. You've created this elaborate fantasy world because you can't stand the fact you lost.

Chris

[Will Hunting]

You're okay with the cheating. It is what it is.

So you can’t specifically point out anything I said that’s not true. Got it.

[Spurtacular]

There was never "nobody around." Watchers from both parties were always there.

Nothing you say is true. You've created this elaborate fantasy world because you can't stand the fact you lost.

I just imagine your sinister psychopath voice when you say stupid sh** like this.

[ElNono]

There was never "nobody around." Watchers from both parties were always there.

And independent poll watchers too.

[Spurtacular]

So you can’t specifically point out anything I said that’s not true. Got it.

100K plus vote dumps at 4 AM after kicking out poll watchers is as cheating as it's going to get.
If you can't acknowledge that, it means you're okay with it.

[ElNono]

100K plus vote dumps at 4 AM after kicking out poll watchers is as cheating as it's going to get.

This is demonstrably false. GOP lawyer had to admit in front of the judge that there were always poll watchers there. You want a quote?

[Spurtacular]

This is demonstrably false. GOP lawyer had to admit in front of the judge that there were always poll watchers there. You want a quote?

Learn how voting by mail is fraudulent and insecure

I'm not stopping you from making whatever case you want to make.

[ElNono]

I'm not stopping you from making whatever case you want to make.

It was already made in another thread, including quotes, you're simply in denial.

Sorry this is happening to you.

[Ef-man]

Someone should get control of themselves and come to terms with election results.

I too am sorry this is happening to them.

It was already made in another thread, including quotes, you're simply in denial.

Sorry this is happening to you.