Official Stealing The 2020 Election For Harris/Biden Watch Thread

[spurraider21]

laying the groundwork for SCOTUS

Good chance it'll be won in the states before it fully comes to that.

And what will you say and do when SCOTUS takes a dim view of all the fraud and puts a beatdown on you and overturns Biden's so-called electoral victory?

And the legal standard is preponderance of evidence. But that's just on fraud. The various illegitimate conducting of the election is in play as well.

Sorry, but don't expect SCOTUS to uphold this banana republic sh**.

[Spurtacular]

Yep. Sad day for America when we find out that SCOTUS has been infiltrated.

But knowing is half the battle.

[ChumpDumper]

Yep. Sad day for America when we find out that SCOTUS has been infiltrated.

But knowing is half the battle.

Infiltrated by whom?

[Spurtacular]

Derp jumping in to ride on Lite's line of convo. Par.

[ChumpDumper]

Derp jumping in to ride on Lite's line of convo. Par.

I'm asking you a direct question about what you posted, derp.

Infiltrated by whom?

[Spurtacular]

I'm asking you a direct question about what you posted, derp.

Infiltrated by whom?

Butt licker support tho

[ChumpDumper]

Butt licker support tho

Is your little tantrum over?

Are you able to answer the question without folding and whining?

Infiltrated by whom?

[Spurtacular]

Is your little tantrum over?

Are you able to answer the question without folding and whining?

Infiltrated by whom?

Are you done being a pest?

Didn't think so.

[spurraider21]

Yep. Sad day for America when we find out that SCOTUS has been infiltrated.

But knowing is half the battle.

by gorsuch, kavanaugh, and acb?

yeah those were pretty sad days

[ChumpDumper]

Infiltrated by whom?

[Spurtacular]

by gorsuch, kavanaugh, and acb?

yeah those were pretty sad days

Gorsuch voted to hear the case, did he not?
Though he didn't vote to hear the TX case.

[spurraider21]

Gorsuch voted to hear the case, did he not?

sure. he, alito, and thomas did. but even they noted in their dissent that it would not impact the 2020 election

[quote=Gorsuch dissent][A decision in these cases would not have any implications regarding the 2020 election. (Because Pennsylvania election officials were ordered to separate mailed ballots received after the statutory deadline, see Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar, No. 20A84, ante,p. ___, we know that the State Supreme Court’s decision had no effect on the outcome of any election for federal office in Pennsylvania.) But a decision would provide invaluable guidance for future elections.[/quote]

Though he didn't vote to hear the TX case.

of course not. that case was absurd on its face

[Spurtacular]

sure. he, alito, and thomas did. but even they noted in their dissent that it would not impact the 2020 election

A decision in these cases would not have any implications regarding the 2020 election. (Because Pennsylvania election officials were ordered to separate mailed ballots received after the statutory deadline, see Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar, No. 20A84, ante,p. ___, we know that the State Supreme Court’s decision had no effect on the outcome of any election for federal office in Pennsylvania.) But a decision would provide invaluable guidance for future elections.

That's a fool hearty thing to say without hearing the evidence. But all the same, he is at least not punting on making future elections more fair like the six gold brickers did.

[Spurtacular]

of course not. that case was absurd on its face

You say this about every case that would expose the fraud, tbh.

[ChumpDumper]

You say this about every case that would expose the fraud, tbh.

Show where they alleged fraud, derp.

[spurraider21]

You say this about every case that would expose the fraud, tbh.

not really. nobody brought forward an intelligible case of fraud with any degree of particularity. vast majority of the cases brought forward by trump and co didnt even allege fraud. the ones that did were basically the Kraken cases that were laughed out of court. we kept hearing about this evidence but all we had was "statistical anomalies!". piggybacking off the same thing, the pillow guy put out his video with all these fancy lines on a map showing where the votes were changed, but no actual evidence of vote changes were ever produced by anybody. you cant go into court playing a video of a map with lines, claiming that "these are where the vote changes happened" and submit that as evidence

the whole "electronic vote switching" theory was always nonsense because georgia did a full hand recount.

for all the you gave dems for "muh russia" at least there were never any substantive allegations that russia literally stole the election by switching votes. so for all the "dems just cant accept the results of an election they lost, hillary was supposed to win LOL"... trumpers who cant let go are doing that in spades.

[Leetonidas]

Did Trumps lawyers ever actually allege fraud while in court? If not then why considering all the "evidence" Derp claims is on their side. I mean if you have all this evidence of fraud, why not allege it in court where it matters?

(We all know the answer)

[ElNono]

Beavis and Butthead legal analysis

[Spurtacular]

the whole "electronic vote switching" theory was always nonsense because georgia did a full hand recount.

Super secret hand counts by partisans and tabulated by the same cheaters are proof of valid elections.

[Spurtacular]

we kept hearing about this evidence but all we had was "statistical anomalies!".

A sh** load of them were posted here. They are undeniable to non sperm shielders.

[Spurtacular]

for all the you gave dems for "muh russia" at least there were never any substantive allegations that russia literally stole the election by switching votes.

But there were allegations by many re s on your side all the same.

[Spurtacular]

not really. nobody brought forward an intelligible case of fraud with any degree of particularity. vast majority of the cases brought forward by trump and co didnt even allege fraud.

You saw the fraud on video, dude. You'll sperm shield to the finish line and then some on your victory lap. That's not gonna change.

[ChumpDumper]

A sh** load of them were posted here.

Show the evidence of fraud that was introduced in court.

[ChumpDumper]

You saw the fraud on video

Then why wasn't that presented in court?

[spurraider21]

Beavis and Butthead legal analysis

Lin Wood a "super lawyer"