Reply With Quote
Don't get excited tranny. It has nothing to do with handies.
I guess Monday or Tuesday they are going to hold a seminar in the basement of one of Kushner's crappy apt buildings he owns just to tell us to stay tuned another week.
Don't get excited tranny. It has nothing to do with handies.
Rhetoric and breaking the law are two different things.
Just like your big talk and your wife breaking her vows on your cuckold ass are two different things.
more crazypants schemes
lol PROBABLY CAUSE
He put a Y instead of an E. That apparently gets your beta male juices flowing.
Speaking to the tweet, there has been at least one court filing to request that the voting machines be sequestered.
Derp®️ rhetoric
In which state?
Georgia IIRC in Powell's lawsuit. I would imagine in Michigan and whatever states she files legislation as well.
filing legislation
filing legislation
Legislation
You're comforting yourself, tbh.
(in your 95 page comfort thread)
For what am I to need comfort?
Trump getting thumped Joe Biden, silly.
What will you do if your fantasy doesn't come true?
All that copium... it's not easy, tbh... sorry you have to go through this, but you were warned about it, tbh...
Trump's historic landslide loss.
What was this so-called warning exactly?
Is this the Hammer and Scorecard bull again?
https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/...the-hammer-andDouglas Jones, an associate professor of computer science at the University of Iowa, says that explanation represents a misunderstanding of the voting process.
“If you accept the idea that all of our votes somehow pass through transfer points where computer tampering could make arbitrary changes, the story holds together,” said Jones. “However, that's not the way the system works.”
In most states, Jones explains, before a precinct relays its vote total to the county, the precinct totals are printed, usually in duplicate, and typically in the presence of observers from both political parties.
The process typically then moves as follows:
“One copy of the printout is then signed by witnesses, enclosed with the electronic results cartridge, and sealed in an envelope for hand delivery to the county election office,” said Jones. “Then, in some counties, the electronic results are transmitted by modem for quick reporting of unofficial totals, while the spare printout is posted on the wall for everyone present to look at.”
This is all to say, that interfering with election results at “transfer points” would be unlikely, according to Jones. And that’s by design.
“The fundamental problem is, there are too many witnesses from both parties, the press and the public who can see the numbers going in and compare them with the numbers the state announces,” he said. “This makes tampering at these ‘transfer points; far too easy to detect for this to be an effective attack on the election.”
Elwrongwrong warning people....lololooooloollo
Definitely historic. There's never been voter fraud on this scale before.
You should enjoy your blue mirage while you can.
Answer my question
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
